Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29692740›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2018

Language Patterns Discriminate Mild Depression From Normal Sadness and Euthymic State.

Daria Smirnova, Paul Cumming, Elena Sloeva, Natalia Kuvshinova, Dmitry Romanov, Gennadii Nosachev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Disorganisation and depression: a re-examination of how we think and speak when depressed.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Syntactic Errors in Older Adults with Depression.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daria SmirnovaDepartment of Psychiatry, Addictology, Psychotherapy and Clinical Psychology, Samara State Medical University, Samara, Russia.
Paul CummingSchool of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, QIMR Berghofer Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Elena SloevaDepartment of Pedagogy, Psychology and Psycholinguistics, Samara State Medical University, Samara, Russia.
Natalia KuvshinovaDepartment of Pedagogy, Psychology and Psycholinguistics, Samara State Medical University, Samara, Russia.
Dmitry RomanovDepartment of Psychiatry, Addictology, Psychotherapy and Clinical Psychology, Samara State Medical University, Samara, Russia.
Gennadii NosachevDepartment of Psychiatry, Addictology, Psychotherapy and Clinical Psychology, Samara State Medical University, Samara, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDeviations from typical word use have been previously reported in clinical depression, but language patterns of mild depression (MD), as distinct from normal sadness (NS) and euthymic state, are unknown. In this study, we aimed to apply the linguistic approach as an additional diagnostic key for understanding clinical variability along the continuum of affective states.

methodsWe studied 402 written reports from 124 Russian-speaking patients and 77 healthy controls (HC), including 35 cases of NS, using hand-coding procedures. The focus of our psycholinguistic methods was on lexico-semantic [e.g., rhetorical figures (metaphors, similes)], syntactic [e.g., predominant sentence type (single-clause and multi-clause)], and lexico-grammatical [e.g., pronouns (indefinite, personal)] variables. Statistical evaluations included Cohen's kappa for inter-rater reliability measures, a non-parametric approach (Mann-Whitney

resultsIn MD, as compared with healthy individuals, written responses were longer, demonstrated descriptive rather than analytic style, showed signs of spoken and figurative language, single-clause sentences domination over multi-clause, atypical word order, increased use of personal and indefinite pronouns, and verb use in continuous/imperfective and past tenses. In NS, as compared with HC, we found greater use of lexical repetitions, omission of words, and verbs in continuous and present tenses. MD was significantly differentiated from NS and euthymic state by linguistic variables [98.6%; Wilks' λ(40) = 0.009;

conclusionMD is characterized by patterns of atypical language use distinguishing depression from NS and euthymic state, which points to a potential role of linguistic indicators in diagnosing affective states.

Indexed as

euthymic statelanguage patternsmild depressionnegative pronounsnormal sadnesspast tense verbspersonal pronounsword use

Identifiers

PMID29692740
PMCPMC5902561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.