Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29692659›Full record

ArticleContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)2018

Assessment of quality of life in women five years after breast cancer surgery, members of Breast Cancer Self-Help Groups - non-randomized, cross-sectional study.

Magdalena Sowa, Iwona Głowacka-Mrotek, Ewelina Monastyrska, Tomasz Nowikiewicz, Magdalena Mackiewicz-Milewska, Wojciech Hagner, Wojciech Zegarski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Breast cancer patients' needs and perspectives on a one-on-one peer support program: quantitative and qualitative analyses.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Impact of Time to Initiation of Treatment on the Quality of Life of Women with Breast Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Magdalena SowaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Collegium Medicum of the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Oncology Center in Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Iwona Głowacka-MrotekDepartment of Rehabilitation, Collegium Medicum of the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland.
Ewelina MonastyrskaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Collegium Medicum of the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Oncology Center in Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Tomasz NowikiewiczDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Collegium Medicum of the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Oncology Center in Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Magdalena Mackiewicz-MilewskaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Collegium Medicum of the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland.
Wojciech HagnerDepartment of Rehabilitation, Collegium Medicum of the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland.
Wojciech ZegarskiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Collegium Medicum of the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Oncology Center in Bydgoszcz, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aim of the studyTo assess the quality of life in patients treated for breast cancer who were 5 years after diagnosis and were active members of Breast Cancer Self-Help Groups. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe study had a non-randomized, cross-sectional design. We enrolled 167 women who were more than 5 years after mastectomy and were active members of Breast Cancer Self-Help Groups (group A1). As a control group we enrolled 117 women after mastectomy - not members of such support groups (group A2). For the evaluation of the quality of life in both groups we used the following standardized questionnaires - EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 as well the Mini-MAC scale for the assessment of strategies of coping with disease.

resultsBased on QLQ C30 scores, group A1 had better emotional functioning (

conclusionsMembership in Amazon groups improves functioning in breast cancer patients that can also extend into a five-year period after treatment completion.

Indexed as

breast cancermastectomyquality of lifeSelf-Help Groupsstandardized questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID29692659
PMCPMC5909726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.