Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29692615›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2018

The effects of psychoeducational family intervention on coping strategies of relatives of patients with bipolar I disorder: results from a controlled, real-world, multicentric study.

Gaia Sampogna, Mario Luciano, Valeria Del Vecchio, Claudio Malangone, Corrado De Rosa, Vincenzo Giallonardo, Giuseppina Borriello, Benedetta Pocai, Micaela Savorani, Luca Steardo and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Community Mental Health Services in Italy.Consortium psychiatricum · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 15 institutions in 8 countries.

Gaia SampognaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples.
Mario LucianoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples.
Valeria Del VecchioDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples.
Claudio MalangoneDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples.
Corrado De RosaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples.
Vincenzo GiallonardoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples.
Giuseppina BorrielloDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples.
Benedetta PocaiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples.
Micaela SavoraniDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples.
Luca SteardoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples.
Debora LampisMental Health Centre of Lanusei, Mental Health Unit, Lanusei.
Franco VeltroMental Health Department of Campobasso, Campobasso.
Francesco BartoliDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza.
Francesco BardicchiaMental Health Centre of Grosseto, Mental Health Unit, Grosseto.
Anna Maria MoroniNiguarda Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Milan.
Giusy CiampiniMental Health Centre of Lanciano, Mental Health Unit, Lanciano.
Emanuele OrlandiMental Health Centre of Sassuolo, Mental Health Unit, Sassuolo.
Silvia FerrariUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Department of Psychiatry, Reggio Emilia.
Silvia BiondiMental Health Centre of Montecatini, Mental Health Unit, Montecatini.
Sonia IapichinoMental Health Centre of Montecatini, Mental Health Unit, Montecatini.
Enrico PompiliMental Health Centre of Rome, Mental Health Unit, Rome.
Massimiliano PiselliMental Health Centre of Foligno, Mental Health Unit, Foligno.
Alfonso TortorellaDepartment of Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Giuseppe CarràDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza.
Andrea FiorilloDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITAzienda Sanitaria Locale Roma 3 · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITConsorzio Milano Ricerche · ITInstitute of Mental Health · INInstitute of Mental Health · RSMental Health Services · DKNational Institute of Mental Health · CZOspedale Misericordia - Grosseto · ITRisk Engineering (Bulgaria) · BGSubstance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration · USUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITUniversity of Perugia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Psychoeducational family intervention (PFI) has been proven to be effective in improving the levels of family burden and patients' personal functioning in schizophrenia and bipolar disorders (BDs). Less is known about the impact of PFI on relatives' coping strategies in BD. Methods: A multicenter, controlled, outpatient trial funded by the Italian Ministry of Health and coordinated by the Department of Psychiatry of the University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" has been conducted in patients with bipolar I disorder (BD-I) and their key relatives consecutively recruited in 11 randomly selected Italian community mental health centers. We aim to test the hypothesis that PFI improves problem-oriented coping strategies in relatives of BD-I patients compared to the Treatment As Usual (TAU) group. Results: The final sample was constituted of 123 patients and 139 relatives. At baseline assessment (T0), the vast majority of relatives already adopted problem-oriented coping strategies more frequently than the emotion-focused ones. At the end of the intervention, relatives receiving PFI reported a higher endorsement of adaptive coping strategies, such as "maintenance of social interests" (odds ratio [OR]=0.309, CI=0.04-0.57; Conclusion: PFI is effective in improving the adaptive coping strategies of relatives of BD-I patients, but further studies are needed for evaluating the long-term benefits of this intervention.

Indexed as

bipolar disordercoping strategiesfamily burdenpsychoeducation family interventionsocial functioning

Identifiers

PMID29692615
PMCPMC5903484
OpenAlexW2796729341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.