Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29692414›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2018

A-to-I RNA editing - immune protector and transcriptome diversifier.

Eli Eisenberg, Erez Y Levanon

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07108348 (The Effect of ADAR1 Expression Level on Total Neoadjuvant Treatment Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 381 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
381citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
20.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07108348 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of ADAR1 Expression Level on Total Neoadjuvant Treatment Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorNecmettin Erbakan UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsRectum Cancer, AdenocarcinomaArmsAdenosine deaminase acting on RNA1
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

381 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 674 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The cellular landscape of druggable RNA-binding proteins.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

321 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eli EisenbergRaymond and Beverly Sackler School of Physics and Astronomy and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. elieis@post.tau.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8681-3202
Erez Y LevanonThe Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel. erez.levanon@biu.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3641-4198
Bar-Ilan University · ILTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modifications of RNA affect its function and stability. RNA editing is unique among these modifications because it not only alters the cellular fate of RNA molecules but also alters their sequence relative to the genome. The most common type of RNA editing is A-to-I editing by double-stranded RNA-specific adenosine deaminase (ADAR) enzymes. Recent transcriptomic studies have identified a number of 'recoding' sites at which A-to-I editing results in non-synonymous substitutions in protein-coding sequences. Many of these recoding sites are conserved within (but not usually across) lineages, are under positive selection and have functional and evolutionary importance. However, systematic mapping of the editome across the animal kingdom has revealed that most A-to-I editing sites are located within mobile elements in non-coding parts of the genome. Editing of these non-coding sites is thought to have a critical role in protecting against activation of innate immunity by self-transcripts. Both recoding and non-coding events have implications for genome evolution and, when deregulated, may lead to disease. Finally, ADARs are now being adapted for RNA engineering purposes.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanMutagenesisRNA EditingTranscriptomeAdenosine DeaminaseAnimalsGenetic EngineeringHumansAdenosine Deaminase

Identifiers

PMID29692414
OpenAlexW2802497454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.