Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29691865›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of community psychology2018

Does Natural Mentoring Matter? A Multilevel Meta-analysis on the Association Between Natural Mentoring and Youth Outcomes.

L Van Dam, D Smit, B Wildschut, S J T Branje, J E Rhodes, M Assink, G J J M Stams

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of community psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03779204 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Transitioning Youth Out of Homelessness: A Mixed Methods Community-Based Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Rent Subsidy and Mentoring Intervention in Three Canadian Cities

TypeinterventionalSponsorUnity Health TorontoRan2019 to 2022Enrolled24ConditionsHomeless PersonsArmsMentorship, Rent Subsidies
NCT05555472 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effectiveness of the Youth Initiated Mentoring Approach for Juvenile Delinquents

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AmsterdamRan2022 to 2024Enrolled300ConditionsJuvenile Delinquency, Youth Initiated Mentoring (YIM) ApproachArmsHalt-intervention, Youth Initiated Mentoring (YIM) approach
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Exploring Profiles of Risk and Protective Factors Among Youth Mentees: For Whom Does Mentoring Work?Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Exploring the Impact of Racism on Black Youth: A Multidimensional Examination of Discriminatory Experiences Across Place and Time.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

L Van DamSpirit Youth Care Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
D SmitDepartment of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
B WildschutDepartment of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
S J T BranjeUtrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J E RhodesUniversity of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA.
M AssinkDepartment of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
G J J M StamsDepartment of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this meta-analytic review, we examined the relation between natural mentoring and youth outcomes in four domains: academic and vocational functioning, social-emotional development, physical health, and psychosocial problems. Natural mentoring relationships are thought to foster positive youth development and buffer against the risks associated with the tumultuous years of adolescence. Two separate meta-analyses were conducted on the presence of a natural mentor and the quality of the natural mentoring relationship, including thirty studies from 1992 to present. The findings indicated that the presence of a natural mentor was significantly associated with positive youth outcomes (r = .106). A larger effect size was found for the quality of the natural mentoring relationship in terms of relatedness, social support, and autonomy support (r = .208). The largest effect sizes were found for social-emotional development and academic and vocational functioning. Risk-status (e.g., teenage mothers, homeless youth, youth in foster care, and youth of alcoholic parents) did not moderate the relation between presence and quality of natural mentoring relationships and youth outcomes, which may indicate that natural mentors are generally beneficial for all youth regardless of risk-status. Implications for theory and practice concerning the quality of the natural mentoring relationship are discussed.

Indexed as

MentoringPsychology, AdolescentAdolescentHumansProgram EvaluationAdolescenceCommunity mental healthMeta-analysisNatural mentoring(Positive) youth outcomesPrevention

Identifiers

PMID29691865
PMCPMC6174947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.