Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29691813›Full record

ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2018

Comparison of healing of full-thickness skin wounds grafted with multidirectional or unidirectional autologous artificial dermis: differential delivery of healing biomarkers.

M R Fontanilla, S Casadiegos, R H Bustos, M A Patarroyo

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M R FontanillaGrupo de Trabajo en Ingeniería de Tejidos, Departamento de Farmacia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Av Carrera 30 # 45-10, Bogotá, Colombia. mrfontanillad@unal.edu.co.
S CasadiegosGrupo de Trabajo en Ingeniería de Tejidos, Departamento de Farmacia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Av Carrera 30 # 45-10, Bogotá, Colombia.
R H BustosGrupo de Trabajo en Ingeniería de Tejidos, Departamento de Farmacia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Av Carrera 30 # 45-10, Bogotá, Colombia.
M A PatarroyoMolecular Biology and Immunology Department, Fundación Instituto de Inmunología de Colombia (FIDIC), Carrera 50 # 26-20., Bogotá, Colombia.

Funding

Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación 1101-569-35037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytokines, chemokines, and growth and remodeling factors orchestrate wound healing when skin damage occurs. During early stages, when the wound is still open, detection and quantification of these compounds might provide biomarkers of skin wound healing, which could aid to complete the scenario provided by clinical follow-up data and histological and histomorphometric analyses. This work assessed and compared the healing of full-thickness skin wounds grafted with artificial dermis made with autologous skin fibroblasts and unidirectional or multidirectional type I collagen scaffolds to test this hypothesis. Biomarkers of healing were detected and quantified in the culture medium of artificial dermis and exudates from the grafted wounds. Clinical follow-up of animals and histological and histomorphometric analysis showed differences in graft integration, wound closure, and histological and histomorphometric parameters. Surface plasmon resonance quantification of 13 healing biomarkers indicated differential secretion of most of the quantified factors in culture medium by the multidirectional and unidirectional artificial dermis. Also, there were significant differences between the concentration of some of the factors analyzed in the exudates of wounds grafted with the evaluated artificial dermis. These findings suggest that differential delivery of healing biomarkers induced by the directionality of the scaffold used to produce the multidirectional and unidirectional dermis was sufficient to create two skin wound microenvironments that determined a different outcome of healing. Overall, data indicate that healing of wounds grafted with multidirectional autologous artificial dermis is better than that of the wounds grafted with the unidirectional one.

Indexed as

Wound HealingAnimalsAutograftsBiomarkersChemokinesCollagen Type ICytokinesDisease Models, AnimalEpidermisIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsSkin, ArtificialSkin DiseasesSkin TransplantationSurface Plasmon ResonanceTissue ScaffoldsBiomarkersChemokinesCollagen Type ICytokinesIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsDifferential delivery of bioactive compoundsFiber orientationHealing biomarkersHealing of full-thickness skin woundsMultidirectional and unidirectional autologous artificial dermisSPR quantification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.