Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29691804›Full record

ArticleThe patient2018

Key Issues and Potential Solutions for Understanding Healthcare Preference Heterogeneity Free from Patient-Level Scale Confounds.

Catharina G M Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Terry N Flynn, Hong Il Yoo, Jay Magidson, Mark Oppe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The patient, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Scale and rate heterogeneity in the EQ-5D-5L valuation.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2024
    Article
  6. Can the General Public Be a Proxy for an "At-Risk" Group in a Patient Preference Study? A Disease Prevention Example in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Catharina G M Groothuis-OudshoornDepartment of Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty BMS, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands. c.g.m.oudshoorn@utwente.nl.
Terry N FlynnTF Choices LTD, Nottingham, NG5 8JE, UK.
Hong Il YooDurham University Business School, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LB, UK.
Jay MagidsonStatistical Innovations Inc., 375 Concord Ave. (Suite 007), Belmont, MA, 02478, USA.
Mark OppeEuroQol Research Foundation, Marten Meesweg 107, 3068 AV, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overChoice BehaviorDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, OrganizationalPatient PreferenceUnited States

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.