Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29691747›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2018

Enhanced adsorption of uranium by modified red muds: adsorption behavior study.

Wanying Wu, Diyun Chen, Jinwen Li, Minhua Su, Nan Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Application Progress ofIndian journal of microbiology · 2021
    Review
  4. Adsorption of U(VI) from aqueous solution by using KMnOEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  5. Efficiently immobilizing uranium (VI) by oxidized carbon foam.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wanying WuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Radionuclides Pollution Control and Resources, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 51006, China.
Diyun ChenGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Radionuclides Pollution Control and Resources, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 51006, China.
Jinwen LiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Radionuclides Pollution Control and Resources, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 51006, China.
Minhua SuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Radionuclides Pollution Control and Resources, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 51006, China. mhsu@gzhu.edu.cn.
Nan ChenGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Radionuclides Pollution Control and Resources, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 51006, China. nancychen@126.com.
Guangzhou University · CN

Funding

Guangzhou University's Training Program for Excellent New-recruited Doctors YB201710National Natural Science Foundations of China 51708143National Natural Science Foundations of China U1501231The Project of Guangdong Province Radioactive Pollution Control and Resource Reuse Key Laboratory 2012A061400023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uranium is a hazardous and radioactive element. Effective removal of uranium from wastewater stream requires advanced functional materials and reliable technologies. Red mud is a type of low-cost adsorbent which is widely used in the adsorption process. In the present work, we successfully modified the raw red mud to gain a series of highly efficient sorbents for uranium removal. They are nitric acid dealkalized red mud (DRM), aluminum nitrate modified red mud (ARM), and ferric nitrate modified red mud (FRM). The adsorption efficiencies of uranium(VI) by DRM, ARM, and FRM were 74.50, 95.56, and 98.75% in their optimal immobilization regions, respectively. The chemisorption of uranium dominates the adsorption process of FRM, while as to physical adsorption dominates the adsorption process of ARM and DRM. Both DRM and ARM reached their maximum adsorption capacities at 10 min while that for FRM occurred at 30 min. FRM performed much stronger anti-interference ability to the influence of carbonate and calcium. The outstanding adsorption ability of these modified red muds is mainly due to the enhancement of ion exchange, co-precipitation, and electrostatic attraction by red mud's active components and functional groups.

Indexed as

AdsorptionAluminum CompoundsFerric CompoundsHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationIndustrial WasteIon ExchangeNitratesUraniumWastewaterWater Pollutants, RadioactiveWater PurificationAluminum Compoundsaluminum nitrateFerric Compoundsferric nitrateIndustrial WasteNitratesUraniumWastewaterWater Pollutants, RadioactiveAdsorption behaviorAluminum nitrateDealkalizationFerric nitrateNitric acidRed mudUranium

Identifiers

PMID29691747
OpenAlexW2801592117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.