Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29691696›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2019

Influence of glaucoma surgery on the ocular surface using oculus keratograph.

Sue Zhong, Hezheng Zhou, Xiao Chen, Wenqiang Zhang, Liqun Yi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Managing the ocular surface after glaucoma filtration surgery: an orphan topic.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Glaucoma and Dry Eye Disease: Opportunity to Assess and Treat.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sue ZhongSouthern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Hezheng ZhouSouthern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China. zhoueye@qq.com.
Xiao ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Wuhan General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army, 627 S. Wu Luo Road, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei, China.
Wenqiang ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Wuhan General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army, 627 S. Wu Luo Road, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei, China.
Liqun YiDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Second People's Hospital of Three Gorges University, Yichang, 443000, Hubei, China.
Wuhan General Hospital of Guangzhou · CNChina Three Gorges University · CNSouthern Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the influence of trabeculectomy and phacotrabeculectomy on the ocular surface.

designRetrospective, case-control study.

methodsEighty-one samples without dry eyes were recruited and divided into three groups, including phacoemulsification group (N = 30) as control group, trabeculectomy group (N = 27) and phacotrabeculectomy group (N = 24) as study groups. Ocular surface parameters, including noninvasive keratograph first (NifBUT) and average (NiaBUT) tear film breakup time, tear meniscus height (TMH) and corneal fluorescein stain (CFS), were estimated preoperatively, at 3 days, 1 month and 3 months postoperatively using oculus keratograph.

resultsNo significant difference was observed in ocular surface parameters at baseline among three groups (p > 0.05). The magnitude of NifBUT and NiaBUT was reduced at 3 days and 1 month postoperatively in phacotrabeculectomy group, but greater than that in the other two groups (All p < 0.001). In all the groups, both the NifBUT and NiaBUT tended to recover at 1 and 3 months postoperatively, whereas both of them did not recover to baseline at 3 months postoperatively in trabeculectomy (NifBUT, p = 0.001; NiaBUT, p < 0.001) and phacotrabeculectomy group (NifBUT, p < 0.001; NiaBUT, p = 0.020). TMH was raised at 3 days postoperatively and restored to the baseline level at 1 and 3 months postoperatively for three groups (p > 0.05). CFS was elevated at 3 days postoperatively and different in recovery at 1 and 3 months postoperatively for three groups.

conclusionsThe influence of phacotrabeculectomy on ocular surface is worse than that of trabeculectomy for the short run and is not distinct different for a long time.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceCase-Control StudiesCorneaDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalFemaleGlaucoma, Angle-ClosureHumansMaleMiddle AgedOptometryPhacoemulsificationRetrospective StudiesTearsTrabeculectomyBreakup timeDry eyeGlaucomaOcular surfaceOculus keratograph

Identifiers

PMID29691696
OpenAlexW2801467260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.