ArticleClinical neuroradiology2018
Preoperative Digital Subtraction Angiography in Incidental Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms : How Much is too Much?
Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comparison between the CS-TOF and the CTA/DSA for WEB device management.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2022Article
- Letter to the Editor Regarding "Preoperative Digital Subtraction Angiography in Incidental Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms".Clinical neuroradiology · 2018Article
- Response to Letter to the Editor "Preoperative Digital Subtraction Angiography in Incidental Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms".Clinical neuroradiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDigital subtraction angiography (DSA) is deemed necessary to precisely visualize intracranial aneurysms and define individual treatment strategies. In patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) who were diagnosed by MRI, a four-vessel DSA is usually performed to detect additional aneurysms. This study aimed to evaluate whether the evaluation of all vessels beyond the aneurysm-harboring artery is really necessary. MATERIAL AND
methodsPatients with an UIA that was detected on MRA (TOF/ceMRA) were prospectively included. All patients underwent a four-vessel DSA (including 3D-DSA) and two experienced neuroradiologists independently analyzed the MRI sequences before DSA. The number of aneurysms, size and anatomic localization were documented and correlated with the angiographic findings.
resultsThe DSA revealed a total of 134 aneurysms in 106 patients. Overall sensitivity and negative predictive value of MRA were 95.6% and 95.6%, respectively. In patients with multiple (≥2) aneurysms, 4 very small aneurysms <3 mm in the A2 segment, posterior communicating artery (PcomA), extradural internal carotid artery (ICA) were missed with MRI alone. In one patient with an ICA aneurysm, an additional small MCA bifurcation aneurysm was overlooked by MRA but detected by DSA. The periprocedural complication rate was 0.9%.
conclusionThe rate of aneurysms that were detected by DSA but not by MRA was very low, thus potentially justifying visualization of the vessel harboring aneurysm alone; however, the four-vessel angiography detected further small aneurysms in patients with multiple aneurysms and therefore seems to be indicated in this specific subgroup. This approach has the potential to reduce the risk of complications, the intervention time and thus radiation exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.