Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29691423›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Uniqueness of Protected Areas for Conservation Strategies in the European Union.

Samuel Hoffmann, Carl Beierkuhnlein, Richard Field, Antonello Provenzale, Alessandro Chiarucci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Representativeness of the Natura 2000 network for preserving plant biodiversity in the European Union.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samuel HoffmannDepartment of Biogeography, BayCEER, University of Bayreuth, Universitaetsstr. 30, D-95440, Bayreuth, Germany. samuel.hoffmann@uni-bayreuth.de.ORCID 0000-0002-6176-8406
Carl BeierkuhnleinDepartment of Biogeography, BayCEER, University of Bayreuth, Universitaetsstr. 30, D-95440, Bayreuth, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6456-4628
Richard FieldSchool of Geography, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2613-2688
Antonello ProvenzaleInstitute of Geosciences and Earth Resources, National Research Council of Italy, Via Moruzzi 1, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Alessandro ChiarucciDepartment of Biological, Geological, and Environmental Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Via Irnerio 42, 40126, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1160-235X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protected areas (PAs) constitute major tools in nature conservation. In the European Union (EU), the Birds and Habitats Directives are the most important policies for conservation strategy, legally preserving Europe's characteristic, rare, endemic and threatened biota. We used occurrence data for species listed in the directives' Annexes to assess the uniqueness of major PAs in the EU (National Parks, Biosphere Reserves); this is important for preserving the EU's focal species. We developed a novel, multifunctional approach to calculate different metrics of conservation value that represent different components of species diversity within the PAs, involving inventory diversity, deviation from the species-area relationship, species rarity and differentiation diversity. Applying it, we found that individual PAs frequently vary considerably in their scores on different components, which are often disconnected from PA size. PAs around the EU periphery, often containing few species, are key to conserving species that are rare in the EU. Because our analysis focuses on EU priority species and includes different components of diversity, it allows more appropriate estimation of conservation value inside PAs in context of the EU than recent, high-profile, global-level research. We offer tools to evaluate, and information to regulate, the representativeness, persistence and efficiency of PAs.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiodiversityBirdsComputer SimulationConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemEndangered SpeciesEuropeEuropean UnionParks, Recreational

Identifiers

PMID29691423
PMCPMC5915414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.