Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29691362›Full record

ArticleEmerging microbes & infections2018

Neurotropism and behavioral changes associated with Zika infection in the vector Aedes aegypti.

Julie Gaburro, Asim Bhatti, Jenni Harper, Isabelle Jeanne, Megan Dearnley, Diane Green, Saeid Nahavandi, Prasad N Paradkar, Jean-Bernard Duchemin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging microbes & infections, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julie GaburroCSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6609-6429
Asim BhattiDeakin University, Institute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation (IISRI), Geelong, Australia.
Jenni HarperCSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, Australia.
Isabelle JeanneSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5065-9685
Megan DearnleyCSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, Australia.
Diane GreenCSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, Australia.
Saeid NahavandiDeakin University, Institute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation (IISRI), Geelong, Australia.
Prasad N ParadkarCSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6553-2214
Jean-Bernard DucheminCSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, Australia. Jean-Bernard.Duchemin@csiro.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5044-4855
Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness · AUDeakin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding Zika virus infection dynamics is essential, as its recent emergence revealed possible devastating neuropathologies in humans, thus causing a major threat to public health worldwide. Recent research allowed breakthrough in our understanding of the virus and host pathogenesis; however, little is known on its impact on its main vector, Aedes aegypti. Here we show how Zika virus targets Aedes aegypti's neurons and induces changes in its behavior. Results are compared to dengue virus, another flavivirus, which triggers a different pattern of behavioral changes. We used microelectrode array technology to record electrical spiking activity of mosquito primary neurons post infections and discovered that only Zika virus causes an increase in spiking activity of the neuronal network. Confocal microscopy also revealed an increase in synapse connections for Zika virus-infected neuronal networks. Interestingly, the results also showed that mosquito responds to infection by overexpressing glutamate regulatory genes while maintaining virus levels. This neuro-excitation, possibly via glutamate, could contribute to the observed behavioral changes in Zika virus-infected Aedes aegypti females. This study reveals the importance of virus-vector interaction in arbovirus neurotropism, in humans and vector. However, it appears that the consequences differ in the two hosts, with neuropathology in human host, while behavioral changes in the mosquito vector that may be advantageous to the virus.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalViral TropismAedesAnimalsDengue VirusElectrophysiological PhenomenaFemaleGlutamic AcidHumansMicroelectrodesMicroscopy, ConfocalMosquito VectorsNerve NetNeuronsSynapsesZika VirusGlutamic Acid

Identifiers

PMID29691362
PMCPMC5915379
OpenAlexW2804929963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.