Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29691233›Full record

Trial reportCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2018

Evaluation of Biodistribution of Sulforaphane after Administration of Oral Broccoli Sprout Extract in Melanoma Patients with Multiple Atypical Nevi.

Shawn Tahata, Shivendra V Singh, Yan Lin, Eun-Ryeong Hahm, Jan H Beumer, Susan M Christner, Uma N Rao, Cindy Sander, Ahmad A Tarhini, Hussein Tawbi and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Shawn TahataUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Shivendra V SinghUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Yan LinUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Eun-Ryeong HahmDepartment of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Jan H BeumerUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-8978-9401
Susan M ChristnerUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Uma N RaoUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Cindy SanderUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Ahmad A TarhiniCleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.
Hussein TawbiDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Laura K FerrisDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Melissa WilsonUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Amy RoseUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Catherine M DietzComputer Vision Group, Veytel, LLC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Ellen HughesComputer Vision Group, Veytel, LLC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Jed W FaheyDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Sancy A LeachmanKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Pamela B CassidyKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Lisa H ButterfieldUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Hassane M ZarourUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
John M KirkwoodUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. kirkwoodjm@upmc.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · USOregon Health & Science University · USPittsburgh Supercomputing Center · USCleveland Clinic · USJohns Hopkins University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Jessie Nedrow · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
Pilot Clinical & Molecular Analysis of Atypical Nevus Response to SulforaphaneR21CA161951 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KIRKWOOD, JOHN MUNN · 2012 to 2013
$353k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904NCI NIH HHS R21 CA161951
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Broccoli sprout extract containing sulforaphane (BSE-SFN) has been shown to inhibit ultraviolet radiation-induced damage and tumor progression in skin. This study evaluated the toxicity and potential effects of oral BSE-SFN at three dosages. Seventeen patients who each had at least 2 atypical nevi and a prior history of melanoma were randomly allocated to 50, 100, or 200 μmol oral BSE-SFN daily for 28 days. Atypical nevi were photographed on days 1 and 28, and plasma and nevus samples were taken on days 1, 2, and 28. Endpoints assessed were safety, plasma and skin sulforaphane levels, gross and histologic changes, IHC for phospho-STAT3(Y705), Ki-67, Bcl-2, HMOX1, and TUNEL, plasma cytokine levels, and tissue proteomics. All 17 patients completed 28 days with no dose-limiting toxicities. Plasma sulforaphane levels pooled for days 1, 2, and 28 showed median postadministration increases of 120 ng/mL for 50 μmol, 206 ng/mL for 100 μmol, and 655 ng/mL for 200 μmol. Median skin sulforaphane levels on day 28 were 0.0, 3.1, and 34.1 ng/g for 50, 100, and 200 μmol, respectively. Plasma levels of proinflammatory cytokines decreased from day 1 to 28. The tumor suppressor decorin was increased from day 1 to 28. Oral BSE-SFN is well tolerated at daily doses up to 200 μmol and achieves dose-dependent levels in plasma and skin. A larger efficacy evaluation of 200 μmol daily for longer intervals is now reasonable to better characterize clinical and biological effects of BSE-SFN as chemoprevention for melanoma.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyBrassicaCapsulesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIsothiocyanatesMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNevusPlant ExtractsBiomarkers, TumorCapsulesIsothiocyanatesPlant ExtractssulforaphaneSulfoxides

Identifiers

PMID29691233
PMCPMC6030491
OpenAlexW2802601219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.