Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29690889›Full record

ArticleCell communication and signaling : CCS2018

Effect of colorectal cancer-derived extracellular vesicles on the immunophenotype and cytokine secretion profile of monocytes and macrophages.

Ineta Popēna, Artūrs Ābols, Līga Saulīte, Kārlis Pleiko, Elīna Zandberga, Kaspars Jēkabsons, Edgars Endzeliņš, Alicia Llorente, Aija Linē, Una Riekstiņa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell communication and signaling : CCS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Extracellular vesicles in colorectal cancer.Annals of coloproctology · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The Impacts ofFood science & nutrition · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ineta PopēnaFaculty of Medicine, University of Latvia, Raina blvd. 19, Riga, LV-1568, Latvia.
Artūrs ĀbolsLatvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Ratsupites iela 1, Riga, LV-1067, Latvia.
Līga SaulīteFaculty of Medicine, University of Latvia, Raina blvd. 19, Riga, LV-1568, Latvia.
Kārlis PleikoFaculty of Medicine, University of Latvia, Raina blvd. 19, Riga, LV-1568, Latvia.
Elīna ZandbergaLatvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Ratsupites iela 1, Riga, LV-1067, Latvia.
Kaspars JēkabsonsFaculty of Medicine, University of Latvia, Raina blvd. 19, Riga, LV-1568, Latvia.
Edgars EndzeliņšLatvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Ratsupites iela 1, Riga, LV-1067, Latvia.
Alicia LlorenteDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, 0379, Oslo, Norway.
Aija LinēLatvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Ratsupites iela 1, Riga, LV-1067, Latvia.
Una RiekstiņaFaculty of Medicine, University of Latvia, Raina blvd. 19, Riga, LV-1568, Latvia. una.riekstina@lu.lv.ORCID 0000-0003-2217-7053
University of Latvia · LVLatvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre · LVOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMacrophages are one of the most important players in the tumor microenvironment. The polarization status of tumor associated macrophages into a pro-inflammatory type M1 or anti-inflammatory type M2 may influence cancer progression and patient survival. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are membrane-bound vesicles containing different biomolecules that are involved in cell to cell signal transfer. Accumulating evidence suggests that cancer-derived EVs are taken up by macrophages and modulate their phenotype and cytokine profile. However, the interactions of cancer-derived EVs with monocytes and macrophages at various differentiation and polarization states are poorly understood. In the current study, we have analyzed the uptake and functional effects of primary (SW480) and metastatic (SW620) isogenic colorectal cancer (CRC) cell line-derived EVs on monocytes (M), inactive macrophages (M0) and M1 and M2 polarized macrophages.

methodsTHP-1 monocytes were differentiated into M0 macrophages by addition of phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate. Then M0 macrophages were further polarized into M1 and M2 macrophages in the presence of LPS, IFN- γ, IL-4, and IL-13 respectively. Internalization of SW480 and SW620-derived EVs was analyzed by flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy. Changes in monocyte and macrophage immunophenotype and secretory profile upon EV exposure were analyzed by flow cytometry, quantitative PCR and Luminex assays.

resultsTHP-1 monocytes and M0 macrophages efficiently take up SW480 and SW620-derived EVs, and our results indicate that dynamin-dependent endocytic pathways may be implicated. Interestingly, SW480 and SW620-derived EVs increased CD14 expression in M0 macrophages whereas SW480-derived EVs decreased HLA-DR expression in M1 and M2 polarized macrophages. Moreover, SW480-derived EVs significantly increased CXCL10 expression in monocytes and M0 macrophages. In contrast, SW620-derived EVs induced secretion of IL-6, CXCL10, IL-23 and IL-10 in M0 macrophages. However, addition of CRC cell line-derived EVs together with LPS, IFN- γ (M1) and IL-4, IL-13 (M2) stimuli during macrophage polarization had no additional effect on cytokine expression in M1 and M2 macrophages.

conclusionOur results suggest that CRC cell line-derived EVs are internalized and reprogram the immunophenotype and secretory profile in monocytes and inactive macrophages inducing mixed M1 and M2 cytokine response. Although CRC EVs decreased HLA-DR expression in M1, M2 polarized macrophages, their effect on the secretory profile of M1 and M2 polarized macrophages was negligible.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalChemokinesColorectal NeoplasmsCytokinesDynaminsEndocytosisExtracellular VesiclesHLA-DR AntigensHumansImmunophenotypingInterferon-gammaLectins, C-TypeLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsLipopolysaccharidesChemokinesCytokinesDynaminsHLA-DR AntigensInterferon-gammaLectins, C-TypeLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsLipopolysaccharidesMannose-Binding LectinsMannose ReceptorReceptors, Cell SurfaceTetradecanoylphorbol Acetatecolorectal cancercytokinesendocytosisExtracellular vesiclesmacrophagesmonocytes

Identifiers

PMID29690889
PMCPMC5937830
OpenAlexW2800526008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.