Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29690867›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

Identification of genes directly responding to DLK1 signaling in Callipyge sheep.

Hui Yu, Jolena N Waddell, Shihuan Kuang, Ross L Tellam, Noelle E Cockett, Christopher A Bidwell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. The Role of Protein Methyltransferases in Immunity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Livestock species as emerging models for genomic imprinting.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Functional Identification of PorcineAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fennel (Heliyon · 2021
    Article
  10. Molecular Mechanisms of Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hui YuDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, 270 South Russell Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA. huiyuz@umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5249-0193
Jolena N WaddellDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, 270 South Russell Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Shihuan KuangDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, 270 South Russell Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Ross L TellamCSIRO Animal, Food and Health Sciences, St. Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Noelle E CockettDepartment of Animal, Dairy and Veterinary Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.
Christopher A BidwellDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, 270 South Russell Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA. cbidwell@purdue.edu.
Purdue University West Lafayette · USCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUUtah State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn food animal agriculture, there is a need to identify the mechanisms that can improve the efficiency of muscle growth and protein accretion. Callipyge sheep provide excellent machinery since the up-regulation of DLK1 and RTL1 results in extreme postnatal muscle hypertrophy in distinct muscles. The aim of this study is to distinguish the genes that directly respond to DLK1 and RTL1 signaling from the genes that change as the result of muscle specific effects.

resultsThe quantitative PCR results indicated that DLK1 expression was significantly increased in hypertrophied muscles but not in non-hypertrophied muscles. However, RTL1 was up-regulated in both hypertrophied and non-hypertrophied muscles. Five genes, including PARK7, DNTTIP1, SLC22A3, METTL21E and PDE4D, were consistently co-expressed with DLK1, and therefore were possible transcriptional target genes responding to DLK1 signaling. Treatment of myoblast and myotubes with DLK1 protein induced an average of 1.6-fold and 1.4-fold increase in Dnttip1 and Pde4d expression respectively. Myh4 expression was significantly elevated in DLK1-treated myotubes, whereas the expression of Mettl21e was significantly increased in the DLK1-treated myoblasts but reduced in DLK1-treated myotubes. DLK1 treatment had no impact on Park7 expression. In addition, Park7 and Dnttip1 increased Myh4 and decreased Myh7 promoter activity, resemble to the effects of Dlk1. In contrast, expression of Mettl21e increased Myh7 and decreased Myh4 luciferase activity.

conclusionThe study provided additional supports that RTL1 alone was insufficient to induce muscle hypertrophy and concluded that DLK1 was likely the primary effector of the hypertrophy phenotype. The results also suggested that DNTTIP1 and PDE4D were secondary effector genes responding to DLK1 signaling resulting in muscle fiber switch and muscular hypertrophy in callipyge lamb.

Indexed as

AnimalsCells, CulturedCyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 4HypertrophyMembrane ProteinsMuscle, SkeletalMyoblastsMyosin Heavy ChainsNuclear ProteinsPregnancy ProteinsRecombinant ProteinsSheepSignal TransductionTranscriptomeUp-RegulationCyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 4Membrane ProteinsMyosin Heavy ChainsNuclear ProteinsPregnancy ProteinsRecombinant ProteinsCallipyge sheepDLK1HypertrophyPrimary effectorRTL1Secondary effectorSkeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID29690867
PMCPMC5937834
OpenAlexW2803197026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.