Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29690812›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2018

Analysis of orthopedic surgery of patients with metastatic bone tumors and pathological fractures.

Resit Sevimli, Mehmet Fatih Korkmaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Resit SevimliDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Inonu University School of Medicine, Malatya, Turkey.
Mehmet Fatih KorkmazDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Inonu University School of Medicine, Malatya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7498-6763

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective This study was performed to determine the most common causes, locations, and treatments of metastasizing primary tumors through evaluation of patients with metastatic bone tumors who were admitted to our clinic. Methods In total, 96 patients with metastatic bone tumors who were admitted to our clinic from 2000 to 2016 were included in the study. Results The breast (30 patients, 31.3%) and lung (18 patients, 18.8%) were the most commonly metastasized primary organs. The femur was the most commonly metastasized bone. Conclusions Bone tumors in patients of advanced age are, unless otherwise proven, considered to be metastatic, and the development of specific diagnostic and treatment algorithms is needed. Clinicians should attempt to improve the general condition of patients with tumors exhibiting bone metastasis to increase the patients' quality of life by providing early mobilization. Thus, appropriate patient selection and proper internal fixation are essential.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBone NeoplasmsFemaleFracture Fixation, InternalFractures, SpontaneousHumansMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal PainQuality of Lifebone localizationBone tumorfemurmetastasispathological fractureprimary organs

Identifiers

PMID29690812
PMCPMC6134675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.