ArticleCancer research and treatment2019
Landscape of Actionable Genetic Alterations Profiled from 1,071 Tumor Samples in Korean Cancer Patients.
Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Financing and health system capacity for precision medicine in Asia: a six country landscape analysis.Health affairs scholar · 2026Review
- Evaluation of false positive and false negative errors in targeted next generation sequencing.Genome biology · 2025Article
- High clinical actionability of a pan-cancer tissue-based combined DNA and RNA next generation sequencing assay in a diverse Asian population.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Clinical implementation of next-generation sequencing testing and genomically-matched therapy: a real-world data in a tertiary hospital.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring the DNA methylome of Korean patients with colorectal cancer consolidates the clinical implications of cancer-associated methylation markers.BMB reports · 2024Article
- Real-World Data and Clinical Implications of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)-Based Analysis in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Establishing molecular pathology curriculum for pathology trainees and continued medical education: a collaborative work from the Molecular Pathology Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2023Article
- Clinical Application of Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients With Breast Cancer: Real-World Data.Journal of breast cancer · 2022Article
- Recommendations for the Use of Next-Generation Sequencing and the Molecular Tumor Board for Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Report from KSMO and KCSG Precision Medicine Networking Group.Cancer research and treatment · 2022Article
- Development and Validation of Targeted Gene Sequencing Panel Based Companion Diagnostic for Korean Patients with Solid Tumors.Cancers · 2021Article
- Actionability evaluation of biliary tract cancer by genome transcriptome analysis and Asian cancer knowledgebase.Oncotarget · 2021Article
- Real-world utility of next-generation sequencing for targeted gene analysis and its application to treatment in lung adenocarcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Clinicopathological and Prognostic Values of Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase (Cancer genomics & proteomicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWith the emergence of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, profiling a wide range of genomic alterations has become a possibility resulting in improved implementation of targeted cancer therapy. In Asian populations, the prevalence and spectrum of clinically actionable genetic alterations has not yet been determined because of a lack of studies examining high-throughput cancer genomic data. MATERIALS AND
methodsTo address this issue, 1,071 tumor samples were collected from five major cancer institutes in Korea and analyzed using targeted NGS at a centralized laboratory. Samples were either fresh frozen or formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) and the quality and yield of extracted genomic DNA was assessed. In order to estimate the effect of sample condition on the quality of sequencing results, tissue preparation method, specimen type (resected or biopsied) and tissue storage time were compared.
resultsWe detected 7,360 non-synonymous point mutations, 1,164 small insertions and deletions, 3,173 copy number alterations, and 462 structural variants. Fifty-four percent of tumors had one or more clinically relevant genetic mutation. The distribution of actionable variants was variable among different genes. Fresh frozen tissues, surgically resected specimens, and recently obtained specimens generated superior sequencing results over FFPE tissues, biopsied specimens, and tissues with long storage duration.
conclusionIn order to overcome, challenges involved in bringing NGS testing into routine clinical use, a centralized laboratory model was designed that could improve the NGS workflows, provide appropriate turnaround times and control costs with goal of enabling precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.