ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018
Aerobic Mesophilic, Coliform,
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comprehensive review of regulatory mechanisms of novel enterotoxin genes inAnnals of medicine · 2026Review
- Bacterial contamination and prevalence of antibiotic-resistantVeterinary world · 2026Article
- Systematic review and meta-analysis ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Review
- Impact of Breed and Slaughter Hygiene on Beef Carcass Quality Traits in Northern Greece.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Foodborne Pathogen Prevalence and Biomarker Identification for Microbial Contamination in Mutton Meat.Biology · 2024Article
- Comparative prevalence of diarrheagenicThe Pan African medical journal · 2024Article
- A South African Perspective on the Microbiological and Chemical Quality of Meat: Plausible Public Health Implications.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Surface Hygiene Evaluation Method in Food Trucks as an Important Factor in the Assessment of Microbiological Risks in Mobile Gastronomy.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Safety and quality assessment of street-vended barbecue chicken samples from Faisalabad, Pakistan.Food science & nutrition · 2023Article
- Phylogenetic Groups, Pathotypes and Antimicrobial Resistance ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance, Enterotoxin andMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Food animals as reservoirs and potential sources of multidrug-resistant diarrheagenic E. coli pathotypes: Focus on intensive pig farming in South Africa.The Onderstepoort journal of veterinary research · 2022Article
- Prevalence and Characteristics ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Maximising Societal Benefit From the Control of Neglected Zoonoses: Identifying Synergies and Trade-Offs in the Control ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021Review
- Microbiological quality of beef, mutton, and water from different abattoirs in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa.Veterinary world · 2020Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotype ofBioMed research international · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foodborne disease (FBD) is a global public health concern, and foods from animal sources have been associated with outbreaks of food-related illness. In this study, animal carcasses from the two abattoirs (HT1 and HT2) in the formal meat sector (FMS) and slaughter points in the informal meat sector (INMS) were examined at two stages of slaughter (before washing and after washing) for aerobic colony counts (ACC) and total viable count (TCC), as well as
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.