Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29689734›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuromuscular diseases2018

Evaluation of Children with SMA Type 1 Under Treatment with Nusinersen within the Expanded Access Program in Germany.

Astrid Pechmann, Thorsten Langer, David Schorling, Sabine Stein, Sibylle Vogt, Ulrike Schara, Heike Kölbel, Oliver Schwartz, Andreas Hahn, Kerstin Giese and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Swallowing function in patients with spinal muscular atrophy before and after the introduction of new gene-based therapies: what has changed?Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Astrid PechmannDepartment of Neuropediatrics and Muscle Disorders, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Thorsten LangerDepartment of Neuropediatrics and Muscle Disorders, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
David SchorlingDepartment of Neuropediatrics and Muscle Disorders, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Sabine SteinDepartment of Neuropediatrics and Muscle Disorders, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Sibylle VogtDepartment of Neuropediatrics and Muscle Disorders, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Ulrike ScharaDepartment of Neuropediatrics, Children's Hospital 1, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Heike KölbelDepartment of Neuropediatrics, Children's Hospital 1, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Oliver SchwartzDepartment of Neuropediatrics, University Children's Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Andreas HahnDepartement of Child Neurology, University Hospital Giessen, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.
Kerstin GieseDepartement of Child Neurology, University Hospital Giessen, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.
Jessika JohannsenDepartment of Pediatrics, Neuropediatrics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jonas DeneckeDepartment of Pediatrics, Neuropediatrics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Claudia WeißDepartment of Neuropediatrics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Manuela TheophilDepartment of Pediatrics and Neuropediatrics, DRK Klinikum Westend, Berlin, Germany.
Janbernd KirschnerDepartment of Neuropediatrics and Muscle Disorders, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
University of Freiburg · DEJustus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEDRK Kliniken Berlin · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neuromuscular disorder characterized by muscle weakness and muscle atrophy. Nusinersen acts as a splicing modifier and has recently been approved for intrathecal treatment of SMA.

objectivePrior to approval, nusinersen was provided to patients with SMA type 1 in Germany within an Expanded Access Program (EAP). In contrast to previous clinical trials, children of different age groups and different stages of the disease were treated with nusinersen.

methodsWe conducted a prospective, longitudinal data collection of patients treated with nusinersen within the EAP in seven neuromuscular centers in Germany. Standardized assessments including CHOP-INTEND and HINE-2 motor milestones were performed at baseline and 60 and 180 days after start of treatment.

resultsData from 61 SMA type 1 patients (mean age 21.08 months, range 1-93) were available for analysis. After six months of treatment, 47 children (77.0%) improved by ≥4 points in CHOP INTEND score. Mean change in CHOP INTEND score was 9.0±8.0 points. Nineteen patients (31.1%) improved by ≥2 points in HINE-2 motor milestones. Regression analysis revealed age at onset of treatment as major determinant of change in CHOP INTEND from baseline.

conclusionWhen analyzing a broad spectrum of SMA type 1 patients, many children showed an improvement of motor function after six months of treatment with nusinersen, which is generally not expected within the natural course of the disease. Long-term observation and follow-up of patients with later onset types of SMA are crucial to understand the clinical impact of treatment with nusinersen.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentMotor SkillsChildChild, PreschoolCompassionate Use TrialsFemaleGermanyHumansInfantInjections, SpinalLongitudinal StudiesMaleOligonucleotidesOligonucleotides, AntisenseProspective StudiesSpinal Muscular Atrophies of ChildhoodnusinersenOligonucleotidesOligonucleotides, Antisensemotor functionmotor milestonesnusinersenSMArtCARESpinal muscular atrophy

Identifiers

PMID29689734
PMCPMC6004898
OpenAlexW2802644471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.