Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29689640›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2018

Haploid genetic screens identify genetic vulnerabilities to microtubule-targeting agents.

Nora M Gerhards, Vincent A Blomen, Merve Mutlu, Joppe Nieuwenhuis, Denise Howald, Charlotte Guyader, Jos Jonkers, Thijn R Brummelkamp, Sven Rottenberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The oncogenome of the domestic cat.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Docetaxel response in BRCA1,p53-deficient mammary tumor cells is affected by Huntingtin and BAP1.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nora M GerhardsInstitute of Animal Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Vincent A BlomenDivision of Biochemistry, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Merve MutluInstitute of Animal Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Joppe NieuwenhuisDivision of Biochemistry, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Denise HowaldInstitute of Animal Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Charlotte GuyaderDivision of Molecular Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jos JonkersDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Thijn R BrummelkampDivision of Biochemistry, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sven RottenbergInstitute of Animal Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2044-9844
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The absence of biomarkers to accurately predict anticancer therapy response remains a major obstacle in clinical oncology. We applied a genome-wide loss-of-function screening approach in human haploid cells to characterize genetic vulnerabilities to classical microtubule-targeting agents. Using docetaxel and vinorelbine, two well-established chemotherapeutic agents, we sought to identify genetic alterations sensitizing human HAP1 cells to these drugs. Despite the fact that both drugs act on microtubules, a set of distinct genes were identified whose disruption affects drug sensitivity. For docetaxel, this included a number of genes with a function in mitosis, while for vinorelbine we identified inactivation of FBXW7, RB1, and NF2, three frequently mutated tumor suppressor genes, as sensitizing factors. We validated these genes using independent knockout clones and confirmed FBXW7 as an important regulator of the mitotic spindle assembly. Upon FBXW7 depletion, vinorelbine treatment led to decreased survival of cells due to defective mitotic progression and subsequent mitotic catastrophe. We show that haploid insertional mutagenesis screens are a useful tool to study genetic vulnerabilities to classical chemotherapeutic drugs by identifying thus far unknown sensitivity factors. These results provide a rationale for investigating patient response to vinca alkaloid-based anticancer treatment in relation to the mutational status of these three tumor suppressor genes, and could in the future lead to the establishment of novel predictive biomarkers or suggest new drug combinations based on molecular mechanisms of drug sensitivity.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingHaploidyATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily BCell Cycle ProteinsCell DeathCell Line, TumorF-Box-WD Repeat-Containing Protein 7Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenes, Tumor SuppressorGenome, HumanHumansMicrotubulesMitosisMorpholinesMutagenesis, InsertionalMutation2-(4-morpholinoanilino)-6-cyclohexylaminopurineABCB1 protein, humanATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily BCell Cycle ProteinsF-Box-WD Repeat-Containing Protein 7FBXW7 protein, humanMorpholinesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProtein-Tyrosine KinasesPurinesTTK protein, humanVinorelbinedocetaxelFBXW7haploid screensvinorelbine

Identifiers

PMID29689640
PMCPMC5983209
OpenAlexW2801309894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.