Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29689112›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2018

Ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score is related to NSAID use, especially in patients treated with TNF-α inhibitors.

Marlies J G Carbo, Anneke Spoorenberg, Fiona Maas, Elisabeth Brouwer, Reinhard Bos, Hendrika Bootsma, Eveline van der Veer, Freke Wink, Suzanne Arends

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marlies J G CarboRheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Anneke SpoorenbergRheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Fiona MaasRheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Elisabeth BrouwerRheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Reinhard BosRheumatology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands.
Hendrika BootsmaRheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Eveline van der VeerLaboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Freke WinkRheumatology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands.
Suzanne ArendsRheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLMedisch Centrum Leeuwarden · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are regarded as the cornerstone of conventional treatment for AS. However little is known about concomitant NSAID use during treatment (with TNF-α inhibitors) in daily clinical practice. METHODS AND

findingsConsecutive patients from the GLAS cohort were included. NSAID use and ASAS-NSAID index were evaluated at group level and at individual patient level during 52 weeks of follow-up. Analyses were stratified for treatment regimen. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) was used to evaluate NSAID use in relation to assessments of disease activity over time. In patients starting TNF-α inhibitors (n = 254), 79% used NSAIDs at baseline and this proportion decreased significantly to 38% at 52 weeks. ASAS-NSAID index also decreased significantly from median 65 to 0. In patients on conventional treatment (n = 139), 74% used NSAIDs at baseline with median ASAS-NSAID index of 50 and this remained stable during follow-up. At each follow-up visit, approximately half of the patients changed their type or dose of NSAIDs. GEE analysis over time showed that NSAID use was associated with AS disease activity score (p<0.05). This relation was more pronounced in patients treated with TNF-α inhibitors compared to conventional treatment (B = 0.825 vs. B = 0.250).

conclusionsIn this observational cohort of established AS patients, there was no difference in baseline NSAID use between patients with and without indication for TNF-α inhibitors. NSAID use decreased significantly after starting TNF-α inhibitors. During conventional treatment, NSAID use remained stable at group level. However, NSAID use changed frequently at individual patient level and was significantly associated with disease activity.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAntirheumatic AgentsCohort StudiesEtanerceptFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisResearch DesignSeverity of Illness IndexSpondylitis, AnkylosingTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAntirheumatic AgentsEtanerceptTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID29689112
PMCPMC5915774
OpenAlexW2801222424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.