Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29689049›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Allelic interaction effects of DNA damage and repair genes on the predisposition to age-related cataract.

Mei Yang, Junfang Zhang, Shu Su, Bai Qin, Lihua Kang, Rongrong Zhu, Huaijin Guan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Aberrant expression ofInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mei YangEye Institute, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Junfang ZhangEye Institute, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Shu SuEye Institute, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Bai QinEye Institute, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Lihua KangEye Institute, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Rongrong ZhuEye Institute, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Huaijin GuanEye Institute, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University · CNNantong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAge-related cataract (ARC) is a leading cause of visual impairment and blindness worldwide. DNA damage and malfunction of DNA repair are believed to contribute to the pathogenesis of ARC. Aside from increasing age, the risk factors for ARC appear to be rather complex, and one or more gene variations could play critical roles in the diverse processes of ARC progression. This study aimed to investigate the combined effects of different genetic variants on ARC risk.

methodsA cohort of 789 ARC patients and 531 normal controls from the Jiangsu Eye Study was included in this study. Genotyping of 18 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 4 DNA damage/repair genes was performed using TaqMan SNP assays. SNP-SNP interactions were analyzed via multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR), classification and regression tree (CART) and genetic risk score (GRS) analyses.

resultsBased on single-locus analyses of the 18 SNPs examined, WRN-rs11574311 (T>C) was associated with ARC risk. However, in MDR, the gene-gene interaction among the five SNPs (WRN-rs4733220 (G>A), WRN-rs1801195 (T>G), OGG1-rs2072668 (G>C) and OGG1-rs2304277 (A>G)) on ARC risk was significant (OR = 5.03, 95% CI: 3.54~7.13). CART analyses also revealed that the combination of five SNPs above was the best polymorphic signature for discriminating between the cases and the controls. The overall odds ratio for CART ranged from 4.56 to 7.90 showing an incremental risk for ARC. This result indicated that these critical SNPs participate in complex interactions. The GRS results showed an increased risk for ARC among individuals with the SNPs in this polymorphic signature.

conclusionThe use of multifactorial analysis (or an integrated approach) rather than a single methodology could be an improved strategy for identifying complex gene interactions. The multifactorial approach used in this study has the potential to identify complex biological relationships among ARC-related genes and processes. This approach will lead to the discovery of novel biological information, ultimately improving ARC risk management.

Indexed as

AllelesAgedCase-Control StudiesCataractDNA DamageEpistasis, GeneticFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMalePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID29689049
PMCPMC5915686
OpenAlexW2800015233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.