ReviewCurrent opinion in critical care2018
In-hospital cardiac arrest: are we overlooking a key distinction?
Review in Current opinion in critical care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05520762 (Hospital Airway Resuscitation Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Hospital Airway Resuscitation Trial: A Cluster-Randomized, Pragmatic Trial
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Predictive Value of Red Blood Cell Distribution Width for the Prognosis of Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- The use and impact of prehospital blood lactate measurements in acute non-traumatic patients: a systematic review.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Characteristics and outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest in COVID-19. A systematic review and meta-analysis.Cardiology journal · 2021Pooled it
- Pre-arrest and intra-arrest prognostic factors associated with survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2019Pooled it
- Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest: A systematic review.Resuscitation · 2018Pooled it
- Hemoglobin trends and transfusion practices after cardiac arrest: a cohort study.Journal of intensive care · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Yield of CT Imaging and Point-of-Care Ultrasound After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.Chest · 2026Observational
- Diagnostic yield and spectrum of head CT findings after return of spontaneous circulation in non-traumatic in-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective cohort study.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Advancing palliative care in cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock: identifying evidence gaps and future research priorities.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Grouping of Emergency Department-based Cardiac Arrest Patients According to Clinical Features to Assess Patient Outcomes.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Observational
- Predicting In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Using Machine Learning Models: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Left ventricular unloading during extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a target trial emulation of the ELSO registry.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
- Why physicians use sodium bicarbonate during cardiac arrest: A cross-sectional survey study of adult and pediatric clinicians.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- [Quality of life after in-hospital cardiac arrest : An 11-year experience from an university center].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2024Article
- Clinical update on COVID-19 for the emergency clinician: Cardiac arrest in the out-of-hospital and in-hospital settings.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2022Review
- Effectiveness of alternative shock strategies for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review.Resuscitation plus · 2022Review
- Getting better or getting by?: A qualitative study of in-hospital cardiac arrest survivors long-term recovery experiences.SSM. Qualitative research in health · 2021Article
- Outcomes of Targeted Temperature Management for In-Hospital and Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Matched Case-Control Study Using the National Database of Taiwan Network of Targeted Temperature Management for Cardiac Arrest (TIMECARD) Registry.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021Article
- Lactate and hypotension as predictors of mortality after in-hospital cardiac arrest.Resuscitation · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo review the epidemiology, peri-arrest management, and research priorities related to in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) and explore key distinctions between IHCA and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) as they pertain to the clinician and resuscitation scientist. RECENT
findingsIHCA is a common and highly morbid event amongst hospitalized patients in the United States. As compared with patients who experience an OHCA, patients who experience an IHCA tend to have more medical comorbidities, have a witnessed arrest, and be attended to by professional first responders. Further, providers resuscitating patients from IHCA commonly have access to tools and information not readily available to the OHCA responders. Despite these differences, society guidelines for the peri-arrest management of patients with IHCA are often based on data extrapolated from the OHCA population. To advance the care of patients with IHCA, clinicians and investigators should recognize the many important distinctions between OHCA and IHCA. SUMMARY: IHCA is a unique disease entity with an epidemiology and natural history that are distinct from OHCA. In both research and clinical practice, physicians should recognize these distinctions so as to advance the care of IHCA victims.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.