Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29688862›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2018

The cost-effectiveness of oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis and early antiretroviral therapy in the presence of drug resistance among men who have sex with men in San Francisco.

Mingwang Shen, Yanni Xiao, Libin Rong, Lauren Ancel Meyers, Steven E Bellan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Daily Oral HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Among Young Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States: Cost-saving at Generic Drug Price.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mingwang ShenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, People's Republic of China.
Yanni XiaoSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, People's Republic of China. yxiao@mail.xjtu.edu.cn.
Libin RongDepartment of Mathematics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Lauren Ancel MeyersDepartment of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Steven E BellanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.

Funding

Impacts of Individual and Social Behavior on Influenza Dynamics and ControlU01GM087719 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GALVANI, ALISON P, MEYERS, LAUREN ANCEL · 2009 to 2018
$6.3M
Integrative Modeling of study design and transmission dynamics to infer epidemic drivers and inform decision-making: Applications to HIV and other emerging pathogensK01AI125830 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI BELLAN, STEVEN E · 2016 to 2018
$397k
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases K01 award K01AI125830National Mega-project of Science Research 2017ZX10201101-002-002 (YX)National Natural Science Foundation of China 11571273 (YX)National Natural Science Foundation of China 11631012 (YX)National Science Foundation DMS-1758290US National Institute of General Medical Sciences Model of Infectious Disease Agent Study U01GM087719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor adherence to either antiretroviral treatment (ART) or pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) can promote drug resistance, though this risk is thought to be considerably higher for ART. In the population of men who have sex with men (MSM) in San Francisco, PrEP coverage reached 9.6% in 2014 and has continued to rise. Given the risk of drug resistance and high cost of second-line drugs, the costs and benefits of initiating ART earlier while expanding PrEP coverage remain unclear.

methodsWe develop an infection-age-structured mathematical model and fit this model to the annual incidence of AIDS cases and deaths directly, and to resistance and demographic data indirectly. We investigate the impact of six various intervention scenarios (low, medium, or high PrEP coverage, with or without earlier ART) over the next 20 years.

resultsLow (medium, high) PrEP coverage with earlier ART could prevent 22% (42%, 57%) of a projected 44,508 total new infections and 8% (26%, 41%) of a projected 18,426 new drug-resistant infections, and result in a gain of 43,649 (74,048, 103,270) QALYs over 20 years compared to the status quo, at a cost of $4745 ($78,811, $115,320) per QALY gained, respectively.

conclusionsHigh PrEP coverage with earlier ART is expected to provide the greatest benefit but also entail the highest costs among the strategies considered. This strategy is cost-effective for the San Francisco MSM population, even considering the acquisition and transmission of ART-mediated drug resistance. However, without a substantial increase to San Francisco's annual HIV budget, the most advisable strategy may be initiating ART earlier, while maintaining current strategies of PrEP enrollment.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisDrug ResistanceHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansIncidenceMalePre-Exposure ProphylaxisSan FranciscoAnti-HIV AgentsCost-effectivenessDrug resistanceEarlier ART initiationMathematical modelPre-exposure prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID29688862
PMCPMC5914040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.