ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2018
Critical considerations for the practical utility of health equity tools: a concept mapping study.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Reported Māori consumer experiences of health systems and programs in qualitative research: a systematic review with meta-synthesis.International journal for equity in health · 2019Pooled it
- Reflections and lessons learned from implementing the Ontario Health Equity Impact Assessment Tool in community practice.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Dimensions of housing safety among women living with HIV in British Columbia: Results from a qualitative community-based research study.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026Article
- Key indicators for evaluating Iran's health insurance performance.Health economics review · 2025Article
- Addressing health equity during design and implementation of health system reform initiatives: a scoping review and framework.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- A realist impact evaluation of a tool to strengthen equity in local government policy-making.International journal for equity in health · 2024Article
- Development and Validation of a Mobile-Centered Digital Health Readiness Scale (mDiHERS): Health Literacy and Equity Scale.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Health Equity Impact Assessment (HEIA) reporting tool: developing a checklist for policymakers.International journal for equity in health · 2023Article
- Strengthening local government policies to address health inequities: perspectives from Australian local government stakeholders.International journal for equity in health · 2023Article
- Intersectionality, health equity, and EDI: What's the difference for health researchers?International journal for equity in health · 2022Article
- Findings from a scoping review.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2022Article
- Take it personal! Development and modelling study of an indicated prevention programme for substance use in adolescents and young adults with mild intellectual disabilities and borderline intellectual functioning.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2021Article
- Concept mapping: Engaging stakeholders to identify factors that contribute to empowerment in the water and sanitation sector in West Africa.SSM - population health · 2019Article
- The social context of substance use among older adults: Implications for nursing practice.Nursing open · 2019Article
- Scenarios for population health inequalities in 2030 in Europe: the EURO-HEALTHY project experience.International journal for equity in health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPromoting health equity within health systems is a priority and challenge worldwide. Health equity tools have been identified as one strategy for integrating health equity considerations into health systems. Although there has been a proliferation of health equity tools, there has been limited attention to evaluating these tools for their practicality and thus their likelihood for uptake.
methodsWithin the context of a large program of research, the Equity Lens in Public Health (ELPH), we conducted a concept mapping study to identify key elements and themes related to public health leaders and practitioners' views about what makes a health equity tool practical and useful. Concept mapping is a participatory mixed-method approach to generating ideas and concepts to address a common concern. Participants brainstormed responses to the prompt "To be useful, a health equity tool should…" After participants sorted responses into groups based on similarity and rated them for importance and feasibility, the statements were analyzed using multidimensional scaling, then grouped using cluster analysis. Pattern matching graphs were constructed to illustrate the relationship between the importance and feasibility of statements, and go-zone maps were created to guide subsequent action.
resultsThe process resulted in 67 unique statements that were grouped into six clusters: 1) Evaluation for Improvement; 2) User Friendliness; 3) Explicit Theoretical Background; 4) Templates and Tools 5) Equity Competencies; and 6) Nothing about Me without Me- Client Engaged. The result was a set of concepts and themes describing participants' views of the practicality and usefulness of health equity tools.
conclusionsThese thematic clusters highlight the importance of user friendliness and having user guides, templates and resources to enhance use of equity tools. Furthermore, participants' indicated that practicality was not enough for a tool to be useful. In addition to practical characteristics of the tool, a useful tool is one that encourages and supports the development of practitioner competencies to engage in equity work including critical reflections on power and institutional culture as well as strategies for the involvement of community members impacted by health inequities in program planning and delivery. The results of this study will be used to inform the development of practical criteria to assess health equity tools for application in public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.