Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29688855›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2018

Critical considerations for the practical utility of health equity tools: a concept mapping study.

Bernadette Pauly, Wanda Martin, Kathleen Perkin, Thea van Roode, Albert Kwan, Tobie Patterson, Samantha Tong, Cheryl Prescott, Bruce Wallace, Trevor Hancock and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Findings from a scoping review.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bernadette PaulyCanadian Institute for Substance Use Research (CISUR), University of Victoria, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada. bpauly@uvic.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-4845-1383
Wanda MartinCollege of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, 104 Clinic Place, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5E5, Canada.
Kathleen PerkinBritish Columbia Ministry of Health, PO Box 9646 STN PROV GOVT, Victoria, BC, V8W 9P1, Canada.
Thea van RoodeCanadian Institute for Substance Use Research (CISUR), University of Victoria, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada.
Albert KwanCentre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Equity, Public Health Agency of Canada, 1505 Barrington Street, Suite 1525, Halifax, NS, B3J 3Y6, Canada.
Tobie PattersonFraser Health Authority, Suite 400, Central City Tower, 13450 - 102nd Avenue, Surrey, BC, V3T 0H1, Canada.
Samantha TongFraser Health Authority, Suite 400, Central City Tower, 13450 - 102nd Avenue, Surrey, BC, V3T 0H1, Canada.
Cheryl PrescottClinical Prevention Services Education, BC Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4R4, Canada.
Bruce WallaceCanadian Institute for Substance Use Research (CISUR), University of Victoria, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada.
Trevor HancockSchool of Public Health and Social Policy, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Marjorie MacDonaldCanadian Institute for Substance Use Research (CISUR), University of Victoria, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada.

Funding

CIHR FRN 116688CIHR FRN# 92365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPromoting health equity within health systems is a priority and challenge worldwide. Health equity tools have been identified as one strategy for integrating health equity considerations into health systems. Although there has been a proliferation of health equity tools, there has been limited attention to evaluating these tools for their practicality and thus their likelihood for uptake.

methodsWithin the context of a large program of research, the Equity Lens in Public Health (ELPH), we conducted a concept mapping study to identify key elements and themes related to public health leaders and practitioners' views about what makes a health equity tool practical and useful. Concept mapping is a participatory mixed-method approach to generating ideas and concepts to address a common concern. Participants brainstormed responses to the prompt "To be useful, a health equity tool should…" After participants sorted responses into groups based on similarity and rated them for importance and feasibility, the statements were analyzed using multidimensional scaling, then grouped using cluster analysis. Pattern matching graphs were constructed to illustrate the relationship between the importance and feasibility of statements, and go-zone maps were created to guide subsequent action.

resultsThe process resulted in 67 unique statements that were grouped into six clusters: 1) Evaluation for Improvement; 2) User Friendliness; 3) Explicit Theoretical Background; 4) Templates and Tools 5) Equity Competencies; and 6) Nothing about Me without Me- Client Engaged. The result was a set of concepts and themes describing participants' views of the practicality and usefulness of health equity tools.

conclusionsThese thematic clusters highlight the importance of user friendliness and having user guides, templates and resources to enhance use of equity tools. Furthermore, participants' indicated that practicality was not enough for a tool to be useful. In addition to practical characteristics of the tool, a useful tool is one that encourages and supports the development of practitioner competencies to engage in equity work including critical reflections on power and institutional culture as well as strategies for the involvement of community members impacted by health inequities in program planning and delivery. The results of this study will be used to inform the development of practical criteria to assess health equity tools for application in public health.

Indexed as

Cluster AnalysisHealth EquityHealth PromotionHumansMultivariate AnalysisProgram DevelopmentPublic HealthPublic Health AdministrationAssessment criteriaConcept mappingHealth equityPublic health systemsTools

Identifiers

PMID29688855
PMCPMC5914026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.