Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29688423›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2018

Distinct gene networks modulate floral induction of autonomous maize and photoperiod-dependent teosinte.

Mark A A Minow, Luis M Ávila, Katie Turner, Elena Ponzoni, Iride Mascheretti, Forest M Dussault, Lewis Lukens, Vincenzo Rossi, Joseph Colasanti

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Adaptive introgression from maize has facilitated the establishment of teosinte as a noxious weed in Europe.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mark A A MinowDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Luis M ÁvilaPlant Agriculture Department, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Katie TurnerDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Elena PonzoniCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Cereal and Industrial Crops, Bergamo, Italy.
Iride MascherettiCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Cereal and Industrial Crops, Bergamo, Italy.
Forest M DussaultResearch and Development, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Lewis LukensPlant Agriculture Department, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Vincenzo RossiCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Cereal and Industrial Crops, Bergamo, Italy.
Joseph ColasantiDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
University of Guelph · CACereal Research Centre · ITCanadian Food Inspection Agency · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temperate maize was domesticated from its tropical ancestor, teosinte. Whereas temperate maize is an autonomous day-neutral plant, teosinte is an obligate short-day plant that requires uninterrupted long nights to induce flowering. Leaf-derived florigenic signals trigger reproductive growth in both teosinte and temperate maize. To study the genetic mechanisms underlying floral inductive pathways in maize and teosinte, mRNA and small RNA genome-wide expression analyses were conducted on leaf tissue from plants that were induced or not induced to flower. Transcriptome profiles reveal common differentially expressed genes during floral induction, but a comparison of candidate flowering time genes indicates that photoperiod and autonomous pathways act independently. Expression differences in teosinte are consistent with the current paradigm for photoperiod-induced flowering, where changes in circadian clock output trigger florigen production. Conversely, differentially expressed genes in temperate maize link carbon partitioning and flowering, but also show altered expression of circadian clock genes that are distinct from those altered upon photoperiodic induction in teosinte. Altered miRNA399 levels in both teosinte and maize suggest a novel common connection between flowering and phosphorus perception. These findings provide insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying a strengthened autonomous pathway that enabled maize growth throughout temperate regions.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksPhotoperiodDomesticationFlowersPlant LeavesPlant ProteinsRNA, MessengerRNA, PlantZea maysPlant ProteinsRNA, MessengerRNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID29688423
PMCPMC5972621
OpenAlexW2800441856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.