Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29688421›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2018

Differential Effect of Selection against LINE Retrotransposons among Vertebrates Inferred from Whole-Genome Data and Demographic Modeling.

Alexander T Xue, Robert P Ruggiero, Michael J Hickerson, Stéphane Boissinot

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. On the Base Composition of Transposable Elements.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexander T XueDepartment of Biology: Subprogram in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior, City College and Graduate Center of City University of New York.
Robert P RuggieroNew York University Abu Dhabi, Saadiyat Island Campus, United Arab Emirates.
Michael J HickersonDepartment of Biology: Subprogram in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior, City College and Graduate Center of City University of New York.
Stéphane BoissinotNew York University Abu Dhabi, Saadiyat Island Campus, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

Population Genomics of LINE Retrotransposons in VertebratesR15GM096267 · NIGMS · QUEENS COLLEGE · PI BOISSINOT, STEPHANE · 2011 to 2011
$303k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM096267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variation in LINE composition is one of the major determinants for the substantial size and structural differences among vertebrate genomes. In particular, the larger genomes of mammals are characterized by hundreds of thousands of copies from a single LINE clade, L1, whereas nonmammalian vertebrates possess a much greater diversity of LINEs, yet with orders of magnitude less in copy number. It has been proposed that such variation in copy number among vertebrates is due to differential effect of LINE insertions on host fitness. To investigate LINE selection, we deployed a framework of demographic modeling, coalescent simulations, and probabilistic inference against population-level whole-genome data sets for four model species: one population each of threespine stickleback, green anole, and house mouse, as well as three human populations. Specifically, we inferred a null demographic background utilizing SNP data, which was then exploited to simulate a putative null distribution of summary statistics that was compared with LINE data. Subsequently, we applied the inferred null demographic model with an additional exponential size change parameter, coupled with model selection, to test for neutrality as well as estimate the strength of either negative or positive selection. We found a robust signal for purifying selection in anole and mouse, but a lack of clear evidence for selection in stickleback and human. Overall, we demonstrated LINE insertion dynamics that are not in accordance to a mammalian versus nonmammalian dichotomy, and instead the degree of existing LINE activity together with host-specific demographic history may be the main determinants of LINE abundance.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomicsSelection, GeneticAnimalsDemographyGenetics, PopulationGenomeHumansLong Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsMammalsMiceModels, GeneticPhylogenyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRetroelementsRetroelements

Identifiers

PMID29688421
PMCPMC5963298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.