ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2018
YummyData: providing high-quality open life science data.
Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A framework for integrating biomedical knowledge in Wikidata with open biological and biomedical ontologies and MeSH keywords.Heliyon · 2024Article
- The IDSM mass spectrometry extension: searching mass spectra using SPARQL.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- The SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics Semantic Web of data.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Semantic Data Visualisation for Biomedical Database Catalogues.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Providing Adverse Outcome Pathways from the AOP-Wiki in a Semantic Web Format to Increase Usability and Accessibility of the Content.Applied in vitro toxicology · 2022Article
- OMA orthology in 2021: website overhaul, conserved isoforms, ancestral gene order and more.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- FAIR adoption, assessment and challenges at UniProt.Scientific data · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abstract: Many life science datasets are now available via Linked Data technologies, meaning that they are represented in a common format (the Resource Description Framework), and are accessible via standard APIs (SPARQL endpoints). While this is an important step toward developing an interoperable bioinformatics data landscape, it also creates a new set of obstacles, as it is often difficult for researchers to find the datasets they need. Different providers frequently offer the same datasets, with different levels of support: as well as having more or less up-to-date data, some providers add metadata to describe the content, structures, and ontologies of the stored datasets while others do not. We currently lack a place where researchers can go to easily assess datasets from different providers in terms of metrics such as service stability or metadata richness. We also lack a space for collecting feedback and improving data providers’ awareness of user needs. To address this issue, we have developed YummyData, which consists of two components. One periodically polls a curated list of SPARQL endpoints, monitoring the states of their Linked Data implementations and content. The other presents the information measured for the endpoints and provides a forum for discussion and feedback. YummyData is designed to improve the findability and reusability of life science datasets provided as Linked Data and to foster its adoption. It is freely accessible at http://yummydata.org/. Database URL: http://yummydata.org/
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.