Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29688344›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2019

Dynamic and Cell-Specific DACH1 Expression in Human Neocortical and Striatal Development.

Valentina Castiglioni, Andrea Faedo, Marco Onorati, Vittoria Dickinson Bocchi, Zhen Li, Raffaele Iennaco, Romina Vuono, Gaetano P Bulfamante, Luca Muzio, Gianvito Martino and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Valentina CastiglioniDepartment of Biosciences, Istituto Nazionale di Genetica Molecolare, University of Milan and INGM, Milan, Italy.
Andrea FaedoDepartment of Biosciences, Istituto Nazionale di Genetica Molecolare, University of Milan and INGM, Milan, Italy.
Marco OnoratiDepartment of Biosciences, Istituto Nazionale di Genetica Molecolare, University of Milan and INGM, Milan, Italy.
Vittoria Dickinson BocchiDepartment of Biosciences, Istituto Nazionale di Genetica Molecolare, University of Milan and INGM, Milan, Italy.
Zhen LiDepartment of Neuroscience and Kavli Institute for Neuroscience, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Raffaele IennacoDepartment of Biosciences, Istituto Nazionale di Genetica Molecolare, University of Milan and INGM, Milan, Italy.
Romina VuonoDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, John van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Gaetano P BulfamanteUnit of Human Pathology and Developmental Pathology, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, San Paolo Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Luca MuzioNeuroimmunology Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology (INSpe), Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Gianvito MartinoNeuroimmunology Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology (INSpe), Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Nenad SestanDepartment of Neuroscience and Kavli Institute for Neuroscience, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Roger A BarkerDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, John van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Elena CattaneoDepartment of Biosciences, Istituto Nazionale di Genetica Molecolare, University of Milan and INGM, Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · ITUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_12009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DACH1 is the human homolog of the Drosophila dachshund gene, which is involved in the development of the eye, nervous system, and limbs in the fly. Here, we systematically investigate DACH1 expression patterns during human neurodevelopment, from 5 to 21 postconceptional weeks. By immunodetection analysis, we found that DACH1 is highly expressed in the proliferating neuroprogenitors of the developing cortical ventricular and subventricular regions, while it is absent in the more differentiated cortical plate. Single-cell global transcriptional analysis revealed that DACH1 is specifically enriched in neuroepithelial and ventricular radial glia cells of the developing human neocortex. Moreover, we describe a previously unreported DACH1 expression in the human striatum, in particular in the striatal medium spiny neurons. This finding qualifies DACH1 as a new striatal projection neuron marker, together with PPP1R1B, BCL11B, and EBF1. We finally compared DACH1 expression profile in human and mouse forebrain, where we observed spatio-temporal similarities in its expression pattern thus providing a precise developmental description of DACH1 in the 2 mammalian species.

Indexed as

Aborted FetusCorpus StriatumEpendymoglial CellsEye ProteinsGestational AgeHumansLateral VentriclesNeocortexNeural Stem CellsNeuroepithelial CellsNeurogliaNeuronsProsencephalonSpecies SpecificityTranscription FactorsDACH1 protein, humanEye ProteinsTranscription FactorsDACH1human neocortexhuman striatummedium spiny neuronsneuroepithelial cells

Identifiers

PMID29688344
PMCPMC6458905
OpenAlexW2800630484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.