Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29688304›Full record

SynthesisEuropean heart journal2017

Daily remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: insights from the pooled patient-level data from three randomized controlled trials (IN-TIME, ECOST, TRUST).

Gerhard Hindricks, Niraj Varma, Salem Kacet, Thorsten Lewalter, Peter Søgaard, Laurence Guédon-Moreau, Jochen Proff, Thomas A Gerds, Stefan D Anker, Christian Torp-Pedersen

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European heart journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Effect of remote monitoring on clinical outcomes in European heart failure patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: secondary results of the REMOTE-CIED randomized trial.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Gerhard HindricksInternal Medicine and Cardiology Division, University of Leipzig Heart Center, Strümpellstrasse 39, D-04289 Leipzig, Germany.
Niraj VarmaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, 44195 Cleveland, OH, USA.
Salem KacetCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire, Lille, France.
Thorsten LewalterPeter Osypka Heart Centre, Munich, Germany.
Peter SøgaardHeart Centre and Clinical Institute, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Laurence Guédon-MoreauCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire, Lille, France.
Jochen ProffBiotronik SE & Co. KG, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas A GerdsDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stefan D AnkerInnovative Clinical Trials, Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Christian Torp-PedersenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Aalborg University Hospital · DKCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRBiotronik (Germany) · DECleveland Clinic · USDeutsches Herzzentrum München · DELeipzig Heart Institute · DEUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators may improve clinical outcome. A recent meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials (TRUST, ECOST, IN-TIME) using a specific remote monitoring system with daily transmissions [Biotronik Home Monitoring (HM)] demonstrated improved survival. We performed a patient-level analysis to verify this result with appropriate time-to-event statistics and to investigate further clinical endpoints. Methods and results: Individual data of the TRUST, ECOST, and IN-TIME patients were pooled to calculate absolute risks of endpoints at 1-year follow-up for HM vs. conventional follow-up. All-cause mortality analysis involved all three trials (2405 patients). Other endpoints involved two trials, ECOST and IN-TIME (1078 patients), in which an independent blinded endpoint committee adjudicated the underlying causes of hospitalizations and deaths. The absolute risk of death at 1 year was reduced by 1.9% in the HM group (95% CI: 0.1-3.8%; P = 0.037), equivalent to a risk ratio of 0.62. Also the combined endpoint of all-cause mortality or hospitalization for worsening heart failure (WHF) was significantly reduced (by 5.6%; P = 0.007; risk ratio 0.64). The composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization tended to be reduced by a similar degree (4.1%; P = 0.13; risk ratio 0.85) but without statistical significance. Conclusion: In a pooled analysis of the three trials, HM reduced all-cause mortality and the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or WHF hospitalization. The similar magnitudes of absolute risk reductions for WHF and CV endpoints suggest that the benefit of HM is driven by the prevention of heart failure exacerbation.

Indexed as

Defibrillators, ImplantableAdultArrhythmias, CardiacFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMonitoring, AmbulatoryMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID29688304
PMCPMC5461472
OpenAlexW2612514758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.