Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29688226›Full record

ArticleScientific data2018

Wide-field corneal subbasal nerve plexus mosaics in age-controlled healthy and type 2 diabetes populations.

Neil S Lagali, Stephan Allgeier, Pedro Guimarães, Reza A Badian, Alfredo Ruggeri, Bernd Köhler, Tor Paaske Utheim, Beatrice Peebo, Magnus Peterson, Lars B Dahlin and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Quantifying the Corneal Nerve Whorl Pattern.Translational vision science & technology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Comparative Anatomy of the Mammalian Corneal Subbasal Nerve Plexus.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. CellularBiomedical optics express · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Neil S LagaliDepartment of Ophthalmology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1079-4361
Stephan AllgeierInstitute for Applied Computer Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Pedro GuimarãesDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy.
Reza A BadianFaculty of Health Sciences, University College of Southeast Norway, 3045 Drammen, Norway.
Alfredo RuggeriDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy.
Bernd KöhlerInstitute for Applied Computer Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Tor Paaske UtheimUnit of Regenerative Medicine, Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital; University of Oslo, 0407 Oslo, Norway.
Beatrice PeeboDepartment of Ophthalmology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden.
Magnus PetersonDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Section of Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Uppsala University, 751 22 Uppsala, Sweden.
Lars B DahlinDepartment of Translational Medicine - Hand Surgery, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, 222 41 Malmö, Sweden.
Olov RolandssonDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Section of Family Medicine, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology · DELinköping University · SEOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Padua · ITLund University · SEUmeå University · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A dense nerve plexus in the clear outer window of the eye, the cornea, can be imaged in vivo to enable non-invasive monitoring of peripheral nerve degeneration in diabetes. However, a limited field of view of corneal nerves, operator-dependent image quality, and subjective image sampling methods have led to difficulty in establishing robust diagnostic measures relating to the progression of diabetes and its complications. Here, we use machine-based algorithms to provide wide-area mosaics of the cornea's subbasal nerve plexus (SBP) also accounting for depth (axial) fluctuation of the plexus. Degradation of the SBP with age has been mitigated as a confounding factor by providing a dataset comprising healthy and type 2 diabetes subjects of the same age. To maximize reuse, the dataset includes bilateral eye data, associated clinical parameters, and machine-generated SBP nerve density values obtained through automatic segmentation and nerve tracing algorithms. The dataset can be used to examine nerve degradation patterns to develop tools to non-invasively monitor diabetes progression while avoiding narrow-field imaging and image selection biases.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAgingAlgorithmsCorneaDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansMiddle AgedNerve Tissue

Identifiers

PMID29688226
PMCPMC5914299
OpenAlexW2799955240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.