Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29688171›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

Acute intermittent hypoxia enhances corticospinal synaptic plasticity in humans.

Lasse Christiansen, M A Urbin, Gordon S Mitchell, Monica A Perez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hypoxia and standing balance.European journal of applied physiology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Author response to Panza et al.The Journal of physiology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Hebbian priming of human motor learning.Nature communications · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lasse ChristiansenDepartment of Neurological Surgery, The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami, Miami, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9316-1529
M A UrbinDepartment of Neurological Surgery, The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami, Miami, United States.
Gordon S MitchellCenter for Respiratory Research and Rehabilitation, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States.
Monica A PerezDepartment of Neurological Surgery, The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami, Miami, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8676-3492
University of Miami · USAllen Institute for Brain Science · US

Funding

Corticospinal Function after Spinal Cord InjuryR01NS090622 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PEREZ, MONICA A · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
NIH HHS R01NS090622NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS090622RRD VA I01 RX000815RRD VA I01 RX001807RRD VA I01 RX002474VA Veteran Affairs Merit Review I01RX000815VA Veteran Affairs Merit Review I01RX002474
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute intermittent hypoxia (AIH) enhances voluntary motor output in humans with central nervous system damage. The neural mechanisms contributing to these beneficial effects are unknown. We examined corticospinal function by evaluating motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by cortical and subcortical stimulation of corticospinal axons and the activity in intracortical circuits in a finger muscle before and after 30 min of AIH or sham AIH. We found that the amplitude of cortically and subcortically elicited MEPs increased for 75 min after AIH but not sham AIH while intracortical activity remained unchanged. To examine further these subcortical effects, we assessed spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP) targeting spinal synapses and the excitability of spinal motoneurons. Notably, AIH increased STDP outcomes while spinal motoneuron excitability remained unchanged. Our results provide the first evidence that AIH changes corticospinal function in humans, likely by altering corticospinal-motoneuronal synaptic transmission. AIH may represent a novel noninvasive approach for inducing spinal plasticity in humans.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, MotorHypoxiaNeuronal PlasticityAdultFemaleHumansMaleMotor NeuronsPyramidal TractsYoung Adultcorticospinal excitabilityhumanmotor outputneuroscienceprimary motor cortexrehabilitationspinal motoneuronssynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID29688171
PMCPMC5915172
OpenAlexW2801296097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.