ArticleThe British journal of radiology2018
Incidental pulmonary embolism in oncology patients with current macroscopic malignancy: incidence in different tumour type and impact of delayed treatment on survival outcome.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidence and risk factors of VTE in lung cancer: a meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Incidental pulmonary embolism in oncologic patients-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Pooled it
- Review
- Characteristics of patients with symptomatic and incidental pulmonary thromboembolism.Tuberkuloz ve toraks · 2024Article
- Use of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection and Triage of Cancer-associated Incidental Pulmonary Embolism.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2023Article
- Pulmonary Embolism in the Cancer Associated Thrombosis Landscape.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Characteristics and outcomes of cancer patients who develop pulmonary embolism: A cross-sectional study.Oncology letters · 2022Article
- Emergency management of incidental pulmonary embolism (IPE).Emergency cancer care · 2022Review
- Concurrence of Gastric Cancer and Incidental Pulmonary Embolism May Be a Prognostic Factor for Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients with Incidental Pulmonary Embolism.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the incidence and outcome of incidental pulmonary embolism (iPE) in patients with current macroscopic malignancy and delayed anticoagulation due to late reporting of CT scan.
methodsReports of CT thorax with i.v. contrast done on oncology patients between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2015 in two district general hospitals in UK were reviewed. Electronic patient records of iPE patients were reviewed for demographic and treatment information.
results26 iPEs were reported in 1,604 scans (731 patients), incidence 1.6%; female = 15; median age = 66 (range 32-90); main artery = 10; lobar artery = 8; segmental = 7; subsegmental = 1; median time (range) from scan to reporting = 1 day (0-60); scan to anticoagulation = 5 days (0-61) (three had no treatment); scan to death = 7 months (1-22+) with nine still alive and two lost to follow up. All had metastatic disease. There was no sudden death. None of the patients whose anticoagulation started more than 5 days after the iPE CT scan died within 3 months. iPE was absent in all repeat staging CT scans (done average 3.4 months after the anticoagulation) in 16 patients, without any anticoagulation in one patient with segmental iPE.
conclusionIncidence of iPE in patients with current macroscopic malignancy is low-1.6%-mostly seen in lung, breast and colorectal cancer probably due to frequency of imaging. A few days' delay in anticoagulation does not appear to have an impact on the risk of sudden cardiac death. Advances in knowledge: This study tells us that iPE is infrequent, that it can be treated appropriately with anticoagulation, but this does not necessarily need to begin on the same day of diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.