Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29687965›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology2019

Developments in label-free microfluidic methods for single-cell analysis and sorting.

Thomas R Carey, Kristen L Cotner, Brian Li, Lydia L Sohn

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Sonic snares: Trapping microorganisms for deeper insights into swimming behavior and ciliary dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Flow cytometry and cell sorting.Frontiers in medicine · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas R CareyUC Berkeley-UC San Francisco Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley Graduate Division, Berkeley, California.
Kristen L CotnerUC Berkeley-UC San Francisco Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley Graduate Division, Berkeley, California.
Brian LiUC Berkeley-UC San Francisco Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley Graduate Division, Berkeley, California.
Lydia L SohnUC Berkeley-UC San Francisco Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley Graduate Division, Berkeley, California.
University of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Mechanical Phenotyping of Random Periaerolar Fine Needle Aspiration-Collected Cells for Early Breast Cancer DetectionR01EB024989 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Mark A LaBarge, Lydia L Sohn · 2017 to 2026
$4.8M
A Label-Free, Point-of-Care Platform to Diagnose Acute Promyelocytic LeukemiaR01CA190843 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI FEUSNER, JAMES, SOHN, LYDIA L · 2015 to 2019
$1.6M
Isolating Circulating Tumor CellsR21CA182375 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI SOHN, LYDIA L · 2015 to 2017
$605k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190843NCI NIH HHS R21 CA182375NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB024989NIH HHS T32 GM00815532A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in microfluidic technologies have led to the development of many new tools for both the characterization and sorting of single cells without the need for exogenous labels. Label-free microfluidics reduce the preparation time, reagents needed, and cost of conventional methods based on fluorescent or magnetic labels. Furthermore, these devices enable analysis of cell properties such as mechanical phenotype and dielectric parameters that cannot be characterized with traditional labels. Some of the most promising technologies for current and future development toward label-free, single-cell analysis and sorting include electronic sensors such as Coulter counters and electrical impedance cytometry; deformation analysis using optical traps and deformation cytometry; hydrodynamic sorting such as deterministic lateral displacement, inertial focusing, and microvortex trapping; and acoustic sorting using traveling or standing surface acoustic waves. These label-free microfluidic methods have been used to screen, sort, and analyze cells for a wide range of biomedical and clinical applications, including cell cycle monitoring, rapid complete blood counts, cancer diagnosis, metastatic progression monitoring, HIV and parasite detection, circulating tumor cell isolation, and point-of-care diagnostics. Because of the versatility of label-free methods for characterization and sorting, the low-cost nature of microfluidics, and the rapid prototyping capabilities of modern microfabrication, we expect this class of technology to continue to be an area of high research interest going forward. New developments in this field will contribute to the ongoing paradigm shift in cell analysis and sorting technologies toward label-free microfluidic devices, enabling new capabilities in biomedical research tools as well as clinical diagnostics. This article is categorized under: Diagnostic Tools > Biosensing Diagnostic Tools > Diagnostic Nanodevices.

Indexed as

AnimalsElectricityFlow CytometryHumansMicrofluidicsOptical PhenomenaSingle-Cell AnalysisStaining and Labelinglabel-freemicrofluidicssingle-cell

Identifiers

PMID29687965
PMCPMC6200655
OpenAlexW2800947875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.