Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29687467›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2018

Estimating lead-time bias in lung cancer diagnosis of patients with previous cancers.

Zhiyun Ge, Daniel F Heitjan, David E Gerber, Lei Xuan, Sandi L Pruitt

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Circular RNATranslational cancer research · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhiyun GeDepartment of Statistical Science, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, USA.
Daniel F HeitjanDepartment of Statistical Science, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1527-4472
David E GerberHarold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Lei XuanDepartment of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Sandi L PruittDepartment of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USSouthern Methodist University · US

Funding

Evaluating prior cancer exclusion policy to increase lung cancer trial accrualR03CA191875 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI GERBER, DAVID ERIC, PRUITT, SANDI LEIGH · 2015 to 2016
$162k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA191875
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surprisingly, survival from a diagnosis of lung cancer has been found to be longer for those who experienced a previous cancer than for those with no previous cancer. A possible explanation is lead-time bias, which, by advancing the time of diagnosis, apparently extends survival among those with a previous cancer even when they enjoy no real clinical advantage. We propose a discrete parametric model to jointly describe survival in a no-previous-cancer group (where, by definition, lead-time bias cannot exist) and in a previous-cancer group (where lead-time bias is possible). We model the lead time with a negative binomial distribution and the post-lead-time survival with a linear spline on the logit hazard scale, which allows for survival to differ between groups even in the absence of bias; we denote our model Logit-Spline/Negative Binomial. We fit Logit-Spline/Negative Binomial to a propensity-score matched subset of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data set, conducting sensitivity analyses to assess the effects of key assumptions. With lung cancer-specific death as the end point, the estimated mean lead time is roughly 11 months for stage I&II patients; with overall survival, it is roughly 3.4 months in stage I&II. For patients with higher-stage lung cancers, the mean lead time is 1 month or less for both outcomes. Accounting for lead-time bias reduces the survival advantage of the previous-cancer group when one exists, but it does not nullify it in all cases.

Indexed as

BiasLinear ModelsProportional Hazards ModelsSurvivalAgedAged, 80 and overEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsLung NeoplasmsMaleMedicareNeoplasm StagingPropensity ScoreSEER Programcancer screeningcancer survivorshipconvolutiondiscrete survival distributionspline

Identifiers

PMID29687467
PMCPMC8265914
OpenAlexW2802516827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.