Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29687370›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2018

Performance comparison of two whole genome amplification techniques in frame of multifactor preimplantation genetic testing.

Ludmila Volozonoka, Dmitry Perminov, Liene Korņejeva, Baiba Alkšere, Natālija Novikova, Evija Jokste Pīmane, Arita Blumberga, Inga Kempa, Anna Miskova, Linda Gailīte and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ludmila VolozonokaScientific Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Riga Stradins University, Dzirciema street 16, Riga, LV-1007, Latvia. 027268@rsu.edu.lv.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0413-1481
Dmitry PerminovCentre of Genetics, "IVF Riga" Reproductive Genetics Clinic, Riga, LV-1010, Latvia.
Liene KorņejevaCentre of Genetics, "IVF Riga" Reproductive Genetics Clinic, Riga, LV-1010, Latvia.
Baiba AlkšereCentre of Genetics, "IVF Riga" Reproductive Genetics Clinic, Riga, LV-1010, Latvia.
Natālija NovikovaCentre of Genetics, "IVF Riga" Reproductive Genetics Clinic, Riga, LV-1010, Latvia.
Evija Jokste PīmaneCentre of Genetics, "IVF Riga" Reproductive Genetics Clinic, Riga, LV-1010, Latvia.
Arita BlumbergaCentre of Genetics, "IVF Riga" Reproductive Genetics Clinic, Riga, LV-1010, Latvia.
Inga KempaScientific Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Riga Stradins University, Dzirciema street 16, Riga, LV-1007, Latvia.
Anna MiskovaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Riga Stradins University, Riga, LV-1007, Latvia.
Linda GailīteScientific Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Riga Stradins University, Dzirciema street 16, Riga, LV-1007, Latvia.
Violeta FodinaCentre of Genetics, "IVF Riga" Reproductive Genetics Clinic, Riga, LV-1010, Latvia.
Riga Technical College · LVRiga Stradiņš University · LVLatvia Business College · LV

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare multiple displacement amplification and OmniPlex whole genome amplification technique performance during array comparative genome hybridization (aCGH), Sanger sequencing, SNaPshot and fragment size analysis downstream applications in frame of multifactor embryo preimplantation genetic testing.

methodsPreclinical workup included linked short tandem repeat (STR) marker selection and primer design for loci of interest. It was followed by a family haplotyping, after which an in vitro fertilization preimplantation genetic testing (IVF-PGT) cycle was carried out. A total of 62 embryos were retrieved from nine couples with a confirmed single gene disorder being transmitted in their family with various inheritance traits-autosomal dominant (genes-ACTA2, HTT, KRT14), autosomal recessive (genes-ALOX12B, TPP1, GLB1) and X-linked (genes-MTM1, DMD). Whole genome amplification (WGA) for the day 5 embryo trophectoderm single biopsies was carried out by multiple displacement amplification (MDA) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based technology OmniPlex and was used for direct (Sanger sequencing, fragment size analysis, SNaPshot) and indirect mutation assessment (STR marker haplotyping), and embryo aneuploidy testing by array comparative genome hybridization (aCGH).

resultsFamily haplotyping revealed informative/semi-informative microsatellite markers for all clinical cases for all types of inheritance. Indirect testing gave a persuasive conclusion for all embryos assessed, which was confirmed through direct testing. The overall allele dropout (ADO) rate was higher for PCR-based WGA, and MDA shows a better genomic recovery scale. Five euploid embryos were subjected to elective single embryo transfer (eSET), which resulted in four clinical pregnancies and birth of two healthy children, which proved free of disease causative variants running in the family postnataly.

conclusionsA developed multifactor PGT protocol can be adapted and applied to virtually any genetic condition and is capable of improving single gene disorder preimplantation genetic testing in a patient-tailored manner thus increasing pregnancy rates, saving costs and increasing patient reliability.

Indexed as

AneuploidyBlastocystComparative Genomic HybridizationFemaleFertilization in VitroGenetic TestingHumansMaleNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPregnancyPregnancy RatePreimplantation DiagnosisSingle Embryo TransferTripeptidyl-Peptidase 1Tripeptidyl-Peptidase 1AneuploidyEmbryoPreimplantation genetic testingSingle gene disorderWhole genome amplification

Identifiers

PMID29687370
PMCPMC6086788
OpenAlexW2800990889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.