Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29687154›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2018

Erlotinib in routine clinical practice for first-line maintenance therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

M Faehling, J Achenbach, P Staib, U Steffen, H W Tessen, V E Gaillard, W Brugger

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Oncology letters · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

M FaehlingClinic for Cardiology und Pneumology, Esslingen Hospital, Hirschlandstr. 97, 73730, Esslingen, Germany. m.faehling@klinikum-esslingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2439-7538
J AchenbachDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases and Thoracic Oncology, Lung Clinic Lostau, Lindenstraße 2, 39291, Lostau, Germany.
P StaibClinic for Hematology and Oncology, St. Antonius Hospital, Dechant-Deckers-Str. 8, 52249, Eschweiler, Germany.
U SteffenPneumonology, Private Practice, Kaufhofpassage 5-7, 38440, Wolfsburg, Germany.
H W TessenOncology/Hematology, Oncological Cooperation Harz, Kösliner Str. 14, 38642, Goslar, Germany.
V E GaillardRoche Pharma AG, Medical Affairs, Emil-Barell-Str. 1, 79639, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany.
W BruggerHematology/Oncology, Schwarzwald Baar Clinic, Acad. Teaching Hospital, University of Freiburg, Klinikstr. 11, 78052, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.
Fraunhofer Project Centre Wolfsburg · DEKlinikum Esslingen · DERoche Pharma AG (Germany) · DESankt-Antonius-Hospital Eschweiler · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe controlled phase III trial SATURN demonstrated that maintenance therapy with erlotinib after the first-line platinum-based chemotherapy prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with advanced, non-progressive disease. We conducted the non-interventional study SATURN NIS to investigate the effectiveness and tolerability of erlotinib maintenance in daily clinical practice.

methodsThis single-arm NIS screened 290 patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC (stage IIIB or IV) and stable disease after standard platinum-based first-line chemotherapy in 95 institutions across Germany. Erlotinib was dosed and administered corresponding to the terms of the marketing authorization at the time of recruitment. The main effectiveness endpoint was subjects' OS at 1 year. Subgroup analyses of survival estimates of OS and PFS were performed.

results272 patients were eligible for analysis (median age 66 years, 37.1% females, 99.6% Caucasian, median ECOG performance status 1, 61.8% adenocarcinoma, 96.3% of patients with stable disease). Maintenance therapy with erlotinib resulted in median OS comparable to that of the SATURN phase III trial 10.4 months [95% CI: (8.8; 12.5) vs. 11.9 months]. The 1-year survival rate was 45.6% [95% CI: (37.5%; 53.6%)]. No new safety signals were observed. As expected, patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations derived a greater benefit concerning OS and PFS than EGFR-wild-type patients. Moreover, a significant association of OS and PFS and the smoking status was observed.

conclusionsThe results of this non-interventional study support the current clinical practice of erlotinib switch maintenance in EGFR-mutation-positive patients.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDisease-Free SurvivalErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaintenance ChemotherapyMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProtein Kinase InhibitorsSurvival RateAntineoplastic AgentsEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideProtein Kinase InhibitorsEGFRErlotinib maintenance therapyNon-interventional studyNon-small cell lung cancerOverall survival

Identifiers

PMID29687154
PMCPMC11813406
OpenAlexW2799335786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.