ArticleJournal of graduate medical education2018
Implementation of a Formal Debriefing Program After Pediatric Rapid Response Team Activations.
Article in Journal of graduate medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- "We Don't Want to Cry Wolf": A Qualitative Study About Nurses' Experiences Activating Rapid Response Teams.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2026Article
- Mitigating Moral Distress: Pediatric Critical Care Nurses' Recommendations.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2024Article
- Sepsis and Clinical Simulation: What Is New? (and Old).Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- National Survey: How Do We Approach the Patient at Risk of Clinical Deterioration outside the ICU in the Spanish Context?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Effect of a multi-faceted rapid response system re-design on repeat calling of the rapid response team.PloS one · 2022Observational
- Psychometric Testing of the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH) for Trainee-led, In Situ Simulations in the Pediatric Emergency Department Context.AEM education and training · 2021Article
- Development and implementation of an end-of-shift clinical debriefing method for emergency departments during COVID-19.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2020Article
- Institutional Experience with Investigation and Service for Acute and Post-Traumatic Stress in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.Missouri medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDebriefing after pediatric rapid response team activations (RRT-As) in a tertiary care children's hospital was identified to occur only sporadically. The lack of routine debriefing after RRT-As was identified as a missed learning opportunity.
objectiveWe implemented a formal debriefing program and assessed staff attitudes toward and experiences with debriefing after pediatric RRT-As.
methodsReal-time feedback for pediatrics residents captured clinical and debriefing data for each RRT-A from July 2014 to June 2016. The debriefing on physiology, team communication, and anticipation of clinical deterioration was introduced in July 2015. To assess debriefing perceptions, residents, intensive care fellows, nurses, and respiratory therapists participated in anonymous preintervention and postintervention surveys. We also developed a workshop to teach residents how to lead debriefing.
resultsDebriefing after RRT-As increased from 26% preintervention to 46% postintervention (
conclusionsDebriefing frequency after pediatric RRT-As significantly increased with the introduction of a formal debriefing program. A majority of health professionals and trainees reported this practice was a valuable experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.