ArticleJournal of graduate medical education2018
How Residents Learn From Patient Feedback: A Multi-Institutional Qualitative Study of Pediatrics Residents' Perspectives.
Article in Journal of graduate medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integration of Patient Feedback in Family Medicine Residency Programs: A CERA Study.Family medicine · 2026Article
- Desired features of feedback in a high-paced clinical setting: A Q-methodology study.Medical education · 2026Article
- Patients' Voices and the Assessment of Medical Trainees: A Discourse Analysis.Perspectives on medical education · 2026Review
- Article
- From Blueprints to Build: A Workshop for Developing a Clinical Coaching Program.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2025Article
- Exploring the concepts of consumer feedback systems for occupational therapy student learning during practice placements: A scoping review.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2024Article
- "Everyone who wants to can practice on me"- a qualitative study of patients' view on health profession students' learning in an interprofessional clinical placement.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Medical Students' General Beliefs and Specific Perceptions about Patient Feedback Before and after Training in a Clinical Context.Perspectives on medical education · 2024Article
- Redefining medical education: harnessing the power of patient feedback.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Patients as Feedback Providers: Exploring Medical Students' Credibility Judgments.Perspectives on medical education · 2023Article
- Australian occupational therapists' perspectives of consumers authentically contributing to student learning during practice placements: 'It just makes sense!' but 'we need a process'.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2022Article
- Linking doctor-patient relationship to medical residents' work engagement: The influences of role overload and conflict avoidance.BMC family practice · 2021Article
- Exploring how differently patients and clinical tutors see the same consultation: building evidence for inclusion of real patient feedback in medical education.BMC medical education · 2021Article
- Business Cards as a Mechanism to Encourage Patient Feedback About Trainees.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2021Article
- Measuring Competency of Pharmacy Residents: A Survey of Residency Programs' Methods for Assessment and Evaluation.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResidents may view feedback from patients and their families with greater skepticism than feedback from supervisors and peers. While discussing patient and family feedback with faculty may improve residents' acceptance of feedback and learning, specific strategies have not been identified.
objectiveWe explored pediatrics residents' perspectives of patient feedback and identified strategies that promote residents' reflection on and learning from feedback.
methodsIn this multi-institutional, qualitative study conducted in June and July 2016, we conducted focus groups with a purposive sample of pediatrics residents after their participation in a randomized controlled trial in which they received written patient feedback and either discussed it with faculty or reviewed it independently. Focus group transcripts were audiorecorded, transcribed, and analyzed for themes using the constant comparative approach associated with grounded theory.
resultsThirty-six of 92 (39%) residents participated in 7 focus groups. Four themes emerged: (1) residents valued patient feedback but felt it may lack the specificity they desire; (2) discussing feedback with a trusted faculty member was helpful for self-reflection; (3) residents identified 5 strategies faculty used to facilitate their openness to and acceptance of patient feedback (eg, help resident overcome emotional responses to feedback and situate feedback in the context of lifelong learning); and (4) residents' perceptions of feedback credibility improved when faculty observed patient encounters and solicited feedback on the resident's behalf prior to discussions.
conclusionsDiscussing patient feedback with faculty provided important scaffolding to enhance residents' openness to and reflection on patient feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.