Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29686724›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2018

Feasibility of an AI-Based Measure of the Hand Motions of Expert and Novice Surgeons.

Munenori Uemura, Morimasa Tomikawa, Tiejun Miao, Ryota Souzaki, Satoshi Ieiri, Tomohiko Akahoshi, Alan K Lefor, Makoto Hashizume

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Developing and evaluating image-based metrics for open surgical suturing skill assessment.Global surgical education : journal of the Association for Surgical Education · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Motion analysis of the JHU-ISI Gesture and Skill Assessment Working Set II: learning curve analysis.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. [Artificial intelligence in pediatric surgery : Present and future].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Munenori UemuraDepartment of Advanced Medical Initiatives, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1550-2623
Morimasa TomikawaDepartment of Advanced Medical Initiatives, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Tiejun MiaoTAOS Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryota SouzakiDepartment of Advanced Medicine and Innovative Technology, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Satoshi IeiriDepartment of Advanced Medicine and Innovative Technology, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Tomohiko AkahoshiDepartment of Advanced Medical Initiatives, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Alan K LeforDepartment of Advanced Medical Initiatives, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Makoto HashizumeDepartment of Advanced Medical Initiatives, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kyushu University · JPKyushu University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated whether parameters derived from hand motions of expert and novice surgeons accurately and objectively reflect laparoscopic surgical skill levels using an artificial intelligence system consisting of a three-layer chaos neural network. Sixty-seven surgeons (23 experts and 44 novices) performed a laparoscopic skill assessment task while their hand motions were recorded using a magnetic tracking sensor. Eight parameters evaluated as measures of skill in a previous study were used as inputs to the neural network. Optimization of the neural network was achieved after seven trials with a training dataset of 38 surgeons, with a correct judgment ratio of 0.99. The neural network that prospectively worked with the remaining 29 surgeons had a correct judgment rate of 79% for distinguishing between expert and novice surgeons. In conclusion, our artificial intelligence system distinguished between expert and novice surgeons among surgeons with unknown skill levels.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceClinical CompetenceLaparoscopySurgeonsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationEducation, Medical, ContinuingFeasibility StudiesHandHumansMachine LearningMovementNeural Networks, ComputerTask Performance and Analysis

Identifiers

PMID29686724
PMCPMC5857335
OpenAlexW2791900323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.