ArticlePlant methods2018
Comparison of six different methods to calculate cell densities.
Article in Plant methods, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rheology as a monitoring tool for the biochemical parameters of insect cell-baculovirus system.Biotechnology letters · 2026Article
- DECODE VRL Report No. 1: Lymphocyte Survival After Diagnostic Vitrectomy - Does Size Matter?Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Article
- ProteolyticMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Modulation of calcium, callose synthesis, membrane permeability and pectin methyl-esterase activity affect cell wall composition and embryo yield during Brassica napus microspore embryogenesis.Annals of botany · 2025Article
- Article
- Comprehensive analysis of cellular metrics: From proliferation to mitochondrial membrane potential and cell death in a single sample.Cell death discovery · 2025Article
- Calcium levels modulate embryo yield inFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Article
- Novel stereological method for estimation of cell counts in 3D collagen scaffolds.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Calcium Dynamics, WUSCHEL Expression and Callose Deposition during Somatic Embryogenesis inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Quantifying Microalgae Growth by the Optical Detection of Glucose in the NIR Waveband.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Calcium dynamics and modulation in carrot somatic embryogenesis.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Assessing the suitability of cell counting methods during different stages of a cell processing workflow using an ISO 20391-2 guided study design and analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Impact of Different Cell Counting Methods in Molecular Monitoring of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Cell Wall Composition and Structure Define the Developmental Fate of Embryogenic Microspores inFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Anther and Isolated Microspore Culture in Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.).Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Doubled Haploid Production in High- and Low-Response Genotypes of Rapeseed (Brassica napus) Through Isolated Microspore Culture.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Leukocyte populations and their cell adhesion molecules expression in newborn dromedary camel calves.Veterinary world · 2020Article
- Saving time maintaining reliability: a new method for quantification of Tetranychus urticae damage in Arabidopsis whole rosettes.BMC plant biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFor in vitro culture of plant and animal cells, one of the critical steps is to adjust the initial cell density. A typical example of this is isolated microspore culture, where specific cell densities have been determined for different species. Out of these ranges, microspore growth is not induced, or is severely reduced. A similar situation occurs in many other plant and animal cell culture systems. Traditionally, researchers have used counting chambers (hemacytometers) to calculate cell densities, but little is still known about their technical advantages. In addition, much less information is available about other, alternative methods. In this work, using isolated eggplant microspore cultures and fluorescent beads (fluorospheres) as experimental systems, we performed a comprehensive comparison of six methods to calculate cell densities: (1) a Neubauer improved hemacytometer, (2) an automated cell counter, (3) a manual-counting method, and three flow cytometry methods based on (4) autofluorescence, (5) propidium iodide staining, and (6) side scattered light (SSC).
resultsOur results show that from a technical perspective, hemacytometers are the most reasonable option for cell counting, which may explain their widely spread use. Automated cell counters represent a good compromise between precision and affordability, although with limited accuracy. Finally, the methods based on flow cytometry were, by far, the best in terms of reproducibility and agreement between them, but they showed deficient accuracy and precision.
conclusionsTogether, our results show a thorough technical evaluation of each counting method, provide unambiguous arguments to decide which one is the most convenient for the particular case of each laboratory, and in general, shed light into the best way to determine cell densities for in vitro cell cultures. They may have an impact in such a practice not only in the context of microspore culture, but also in any other plant cell culture procedure, or in any process involving particle counting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.