Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29686646›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2018

Therapy-Induced Neuroplasticity in Chronic Aphasia After Phonological Component Analysis: A Matter of Intensity.

Karine Marcotte, Laura Laird, Tali Bitan, Jed A Meltzer, Simon J Graham, Carol Leonard, Elizabeth Rochon

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rehabilitation interventions for Wernicke's aphasia and related fluent aphasia: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Lesion location may attenuate response to strategy training in acute stroke.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2022
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Review on Treatment-Related Brain Changes in Aphasia.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Karine MarcotteCentre de recherche de l'Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Laura LairdDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Tali BitanDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jed A MeltzerDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Simon J GrahamDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Carol LeonardDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Elizabeth RochonDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
University of Toronto · CABaycrest Hospital · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversity of Haifa · ILUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the growing evidence regarding the importance of intensity and dose in aphasia therapy, few well-controlled studies contrasting the effects of intensive and non-intensive treatment have been conducted to date. Phonological components analysis (PCA) treatment for anomia has been associated with improvements in some patients with chronic aphasia; however, the effect of treatment intensity has not yet been studied with PCA. Thus, the aim of the present study was to identify the effect of intensity on neural processing associated with word retrieval abilities after PCA treatment. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine therapy-induced changes in activation during an overt naming task in two patients who suffered from a stroke in the left middle cerebral artery territory. P1 received intensive PCA treatment whereas P2 received the standard, non-intensive, PCA treatment. Behavioral results indicate that both standard and intensive conditions yielded improved naming performance with treated nouns, but the changes were only significant for the patient who received the intensive treatment. The improvements were found to be long lasting as both patients maintained improved naming at 2-months follow-ups. The associated neuroimaging data indicate that the two treatment conditions were associated with different neural activation changes. The patient who received the standard PCA showed significant increase in activation with treatment in the right anterior cingulate, as well as extensive areas in bilateral posterior and lateral cortices. By contrast, the patient who received intensive PCA showed more decreases in activation following the treatment. Unexpectedly, this patient showed subcortical increase in activation, specifically in the right caudate nucleus. We speculate that the recruitment of the caudate nucleus and the anterior cingulate in these patients reflects the need to suppress errors to improve naming. Thus, both short-term intensive and standard, non-intensive, PCA treatment can improve word retrieval in chronic aphasia, but neuroimaging data suggest that improved naming is associated with different neural activation patterns in the two treatment conditions.

Indexed as

aphasiafunctional magnetic resonance imagingneuroplasticityphonological component analysistreatment

Identifiers

PMID29686646
PMCPMC5900891
OpenAlexW2796659102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.