ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2018
Both Reaction Time and Accuracy Measures of Intraindividual Variability Predict Cognitive Performance in Alzheimer's Disease.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Associations of cognitive intraindividual variability with Alzheimer's disease risk: A systematic review.The Clinical neuropsychologist · 2026Pooled it
- Cognitive intra-individual variability in breast cancer survivors: A systematic review.Applied neuropsychology. AdultPooled it
- Correlates of cognition among people with chronic heart failure and insomnia.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2023Trial
- Validity and Reliability of Smartphone-Based Cognitive Assessment in Older Adults.Annals of geriatric medicine and research · 2026Article
- Autistic Trait Level and Reaction Time in Older Adults: The Influence of Sex and Task upon Study Outcome.Autism in adulthood · 2026Article
- Intraindividual variability in non-household contacts: a German longitudinal study, April 2020-December 2021.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Inter- and intra- individual variability in audiovisual multisensory processes in healthy ageing.Aging brain · 2026Article
- Practice effects on digital cognitive assessment tools: insights from the defense automated neurobehavioral assessment battery.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Lower locus coeruleus integrity is associated with diminished practice effects in clinically unimpaired older individuals.Neurobiology of aging · 2025Article
- Validating a brief performance-based measure of cognition and daily functioning in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025Article
- Recognition memory decline is associated with the progression to prodromal Alzheimer's disease in asymptomatic at-risk individuals.Journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Naturalistic assessment of reaction time variability in older adults at risk for Alzheimer's disease.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2024Article
- Association between Dietary Patterns and Cognitive Function among Qatari Adults: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Qatar Biobank Study.Nutrients · 2023Article
- The effects of COVID-19 on cognitive performance in a community-based cohort: a COVID symptom study biobank prospective cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
- A Review on Smartphone Keystroke Dynamics as a Digital Biomarker for Understanding Neurocognitive Functioning.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- Earth-vertical motion perception assessment using an elevator: a feasibility study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Moving intra-individual variability (IIV) towards clinical utility: IIV measured using a commercial testing platform.Journal of the neurological sciences · 2023Article
- Developing Early Markers of Cognitive Decline and Dementia Derived From Survey Response Behaviors: Protocol for Analyses of Preexisting Large-scale Longitudinal Data.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Relationship between Reaction Times and Post-COVID-19 Symptoms Assessed by a Web-Based Visual Detection Task.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Intraindividual Cognitive Variability and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Aging American Indians: Data from the Strong Heart Study.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dementia researchers around the world prioritize the urgent need for sensitive measurement tools that can detect cognitive and functional change at the earliest stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Sensitive indicators of underlying neural pathology assist in the early detection of cognitive change and are thus important for the evaluation of early-intervention clinical trials. One method that may be particularly well-suited to help achieve this goal involves the quantification of intraindividual variability (IIV) in cognitive performance. The current study aimed to directly compare two methods of estimating IIV (fluctuations in accuracy-based scores vs. those in latency-based scores) to predict cognitive performance in AD. Specifically, we directly compared the relative sensitivity of reaction time (RT)-and accuracy-based estimates of IIV to cognitive compromise. The novelty of the present study, however, centered on the patients we tested [a group of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD)] and the outcome measures we used (a measure of general cognitive function and a measure of episodic memory function). Hence, we compared intraindividual standard deviations (iSDs) from two RT tasks and three accuracy-based memory tasks in patients with possible or probable Alzheimer's dementia (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.