Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29686526›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and health2018

"Alert-Audit-Act": assessment of surveillance and response strategy for malaria elimination in three low-endemic settings of Myanmar in 2016.

Aye Mon Mon Kyaw, Soundappan Kathirvel, Mrinalini Das, Badri Thapa, Nay Yi Yi Linn, Thae Maung Maung, Zaw Lin, Aung Thi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aye Mon Mon KyawNational Malaria Control Programme/Vector Borne Disease Control, Department of Public Health, Ministry of Health and Sports, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar.
Soundappan KathirvelInternational Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Southeast Asia, New Delhi, India.
Mrinalini DasMédecins Sans Frontières (MSF) OCB, New Delhi, India.
Badri ThapaWorld Health Organization Country Office for Myanmar, Yangon, Myanmar.
Nay Yi Yi LinnNational Malaria Control Programme/Vector Borne Disease Control, Department of Public Health, Ministry of Health and Sports, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar.
Thae Maung MaungDepartment of Medical Research, Ministry of Health and Sports, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar.
Zaw LinNational Malaria Control Programme/Vector Borne Disease Control, Department of Public Health, Ministry of Health and Sports, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar.
Aung ThiNational Malaria Control Programme/Vector Borne Disease Control, Department of Public Health, Ministry of Health and Sports, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar.
Ministry of Health and Sports · MM

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMyanmar, a malaria endemic country of Southeast Asia, adopted surveillance and response strategy similar to "1-3-7" Chinese strategy to achieve sub-national elimination in six low-endemic region/states of the country. Among these, Yangon, Bago-East, and Mon region/states have implemented this malaria surveillance and response strategy with modification in 2016. The current study was conducted to assess the case notification, investigation, classification, and response strategy (NICR) in these three states.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study using routine program data of all patients with malaria diagnosed and reported under the National Malaria Control Programme in 2016 from the above three states. As per the program, all malaria cases need to be notified within 1 day and investigated within 3 days of diagnosis and response to control (active case detection and control) should be taken for all indigenous malaria cases within 7 days of diagnosis.

resultsA total of 959 malaria cases were diagnosed from the study area in 2016. Of these, the case NICR details were available only for 312 (32.5%) malaria cases. Of 312 cases, the case notification, investigation, and classification were carried out within 3 days of malaria diagnosis in 95.5% cases (298/312). Of 208 indigenous malaria cases (66.7%, 208/312), response to control was taken in 96.6% (201/208) within 7 days of diagnosis.

conclusionThe timeline at each stage of the strategy namely case notification, investigation, classification, and response to control was followed, and response action was taken in nearly all indigenous malaria cases for the available case information. Strengthening of health information and monitoring system is needed to avoid missing information. Future research on feasibility of mobile/tablet-based surveillance system and providing response to all cases including imported malaria can be further studied.

Indexed as

Case investigationCase notificationIndigenous malariaLow endemicityOperational researchReactive case detection

Identifiers

PMID29686526
PMCPMC5898078
OpenAlexW2807680577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.