Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29686433›Full record

ArticleBioscience2018

Population Abundance and Ecosystem Service Provision: The Case of Birds.

Kevin J Gaston, Daniel T C Cox, Sonia B Canavelli, Daniel García, Baz Hughes, Bea Maas, Daniel Martínez, Darcy Ogada, Richard Inger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Biodiversity isn't measured in tons: Making sense of nature in the context of sustainable agriculture.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Arrhythmia in the earth's pulse: Bird migration timing does not track advancing spring phenology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Drivers of the changing abundance of European birds at two spatial scales.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Demographic rates reveal the benefits of protected areas in a long-lived migratory bird.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kevin J GastonEnvironmental and Sustainability Institute at the University of Exeter, in Penryn, Cornwall, United Kingdom.
Daniel T C CoxEnvironmental and Sustainability Institute at the University of Exeter, in Penryn, Cornwall, United Kingdom.
Sonia B CanavelliNational Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA) Parana Experimental Station, in Entre Rios, Argentina.
Daniel GarcíaDepartment of Organism and System Biology and the Biodiversity Research Unit at Oviedo University, in Asturias, Spain.
Baz HughesWildfowl and Wetlands Trust at the Slimbridge Wetland Centre, in Gloucestershire, United Kingdom.
Bea MaasDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, Division of Conservation Biology, Vegetation Ecology, and Landscape Ecology, at the University of Vienna, Austria.
Daniel MartínezDepartment of Organism and System Biology and the Biodiversity Research Unit at Oviedo University, in Asturias, Spain.
Darcy OgadaAfrica programs at The Peregrine Fund, in Boise, Idaho, and a research associate at the National Museums of Kenya, in Nairobi.
Richard IngerEnvironmental and Sustainability Institute at the University of Exeter, in Penryn, Cornwall, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although there is a diversity of concerns about recent persistent declines in the abundances of many species, the implications for the associated delivery of ecosystem services to people are surprisingly poorly understood. In principle, there are a broad range of potential functional relationships between the abundance of a species or group of species and the magnitude of ecosystem-service provision. Here, we identify the forms these relationships are most likely to take. Focusing on the case of birds, we review the empirical evidence for these functional relationships, with examples of supporting, regulating, and cultural services. Positive relationships between abundance and ecosystem-service provision are the norm (although seldom linear), we found no evidence for hump-shaped relationships, and negative ones were limited to cultural services that value rarity. Given the magnitude of abundance declines among many previously common species, it is likely that there have been substantial losses of ecosystem services, providing important implications for the identification of potential tipping points in relation to defaunation resilience, biodiversity conservation, and human well-being.

Indexed as

ecosystem benefitsecosystem disservicesfunctional relationships

Identifiers

PMID29686433
PMCPMC5905662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.