Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29686261›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2018

Synaptic nanomodules underlie the organization and plasticity of spine synapses.

Martin Hruska, Nathan Henderson, Sylvain J Le Marchand, Haani Jafri, Matthew B Dalva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 142 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
142citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

142 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The how and why for multiple forms of hippocampal LTP.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. CaMKII Drives Synaptic Maturation by Coordinating Spine Remodeling and Receptor Segregation via Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Imaging Synapse Ultrastructure and Organization with STED Microscopy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article

82 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Martin HruskaDepartment of Neuroscience, The Vickie and Jack Farber Institute for Neuroscience, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3186-770X
Nathan HendersonDepartment of Neuroscience, The Vickie and Jack Farber Institute for Neuroscience, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sylvain J Le MarchandBio-Imaging Center, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Haani JafriDepartment of Neuroscience, The Vickie and Jack Farber Institute for Neuroscience, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Matthew B DalvaDepartment of Neuroscience, The Vickie and Jack Farber Institute for Neuroscience, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. matthew.dalva@jefferson.edu.

Funding

Cell-Contact Mediated Mechanisms Assembling Synapses (R01DA022727)R01DA022727 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DALVA, MATTHEW B · 2007 to 2025
$5.2M
Glial Control of Neuronal Progenitor Cell MigrationR01MH100093 · NIMH · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI DALVA, MATTHEW B · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA022727NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experience results in long-lasting changes in dendritic spine size, yet how the molecular architecture of the synapse responds to plasticity remains poorly understood. Here a combined approach of multicolor stimulated emission depletion microscopy (STED) and confocal imaging in rat and mouse demonstrates that structural plasticity is linked to the addition of unitary synaptic nanomodules to spines. Spine synapses in vivo and in vitro contain discrete and aligned subdiffraction modules of pre- and postsynaptic proteins whose number scales linearly with spine size. Live-cell time-lapse super-resolution imaging reveals that NMDA receptor-dependent increases in spine size are accompanied both by enhanced mobility of pre- and postsynaptic modules that remain aligned with each other and by a coordinated increase in the number of nanomodules. These findings suggest a simplified model for experience-dependent structural plasticity relying on an unexpectedly modular nanomolecular architecture of synaptic proteins.

Indexed as

AnimalsDendritic SpinesDisks Large Homolog 4 ProteinImmunohistochemistryLong-Term PotentiationMiceModels, NeurologicalNeuronal PlasticityPlasmidsPrimary Cell CultureRatsReceptors, PresynapticSynapsesSynaptic VesiclesDisks Large Homolog 4 ProteinDlg4 protein, mouseReceptors, Presynaptic

Identifiers

PMID29686261
PMCPMC5920789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.