Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29686150›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2018

Evaluation of Amphotericin B Lipid Formulations for Treatment of Severe Coccidioidomycosis.

Ritam Sidhu, David B Lash, Arash Heidari, Piruthiviraj Natarajan, Royce H Johnson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Immunomodulation in the Treatment of Disseminated Coccidioidomycosis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Current Landscape of Coccidioidomycosis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  4. Coccidioidomycosis: A Contemporary Review.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2022
    Review
  5. Cytotoxicity of Amphotericin B and AmBisome:Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The Rise ofFrontiers in immunology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ritam SidhuDepartment of Medicine, Kern Medical/UCLA, Bakersfield, California, USA.
David B LashDepartment of Pharmacy, Kern Medical, Bakersfield, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1320-9167
Arash HeidariDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Kern Medical/UCLA, Bakersfield, California, USA ArashHeidari@yahoo.com RoyceJohnson@KernMedical.com.
Piruthiviraj NatarajanDepartment of Medicine, Kern Medical/UCLA, Bakersfield, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2702-7476
Royce H JohnsonDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Kern Medical/UCLA, Bakersfield, California, USA ArashHeidari@yahoo.com RoyceJohnson@KernMedical.com.
Kern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with severe coccidioidomycosis infections are often treated with either amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) or liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB). Outcome data with these agents in severe coccidioidomycosis cases are currently lacking. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of ABLC and L-AmB in treating severe coccidioidomycosis. A retrospective pre-post study design was employed. Chart reviews were completed from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2014 for all patients who received lipid-based amphotericin B. Inclusion criteria included having a follow-up complement fixation (CF) titer or a treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) prior to follow-up. Patients with meningeal involvement and pregnant patients were excluded. Treatment outcomes were assessed based on documented completion of therapy as well on symptoms, complement fixation titer, and changes to laboratory monitoring parameters. A total of 108 patients were identified, 69 of whom met the inclusion criteria. There were no statistical differences in demographics or disease burden in those that received ABLC and those that received L-AmB, except that those who received L-AmB were more likely to have previously diagnosed chronic kidney disease (

Indexed as

AdultAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsCoccidioidomycosisDrug CompoundingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAmphotericin BAntifungal Agentsliposomal amphotericin BAbelcetAmBisomeamphotericin Bcoccidioidomycosistreatment

Identifiers

PMID29686150
PMCPMC6021679
OpenAlexW2800020959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.