Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29686130›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2018

Factors associated with consultation rates in general practice in England, 2013-2014: a cross-sectional study.

Toqir K Mukhtar, Clare Bankhead, Sarah Stevens, Rafael Perera, Tim A Holt, Chris Salisbury, Fd Richard Hobbs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Older Patients' Verbal Communication in Interactions With Primary Care Staff: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Trends in clinical workload in UK primary care 2005-2019: a retrospective cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  9. Understanding access to general practice through the lens of candidacy: a critical review of the literature.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Toqir K MukhtarDepartment of Population, Policy and Practice, University College London, and PhD student, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
Clare BankheadNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford.
Sarah StevensNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford.
Rafael PereraNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford.
Tim A HoltNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford.
Chris SalisburyCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol.
Fd Richard HobbsNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford.

Funding

Department of Health IS-SPC-0514-10043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorkload in general practice has risen during the last decade, but the factors associated with this increase are unclear.

aimTo examine factors associated with consultation rates in general practice. DESIGN AND

settingA cross-sectional study examining a sample of 304 937 patients registered at 316 English practices between 2013 and 2014, drawn from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.

methodAge, sex, ethnicity, smoking status, and deprivation measures were linked with practice-level data on staffing, rurality, training practice status, and Quality and Outcomes Framework performance. Multilevel analyses of patient consultation rates were conducted.

resultsConsultations were grouped into three types: all (GP or nurse), GP, and nurse. Non-smokers consulted less than current smokers (all: rate ratio [RR] = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.87 to 0.89; GP: RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.87 to 0.89; nurse: RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.90 to 0.92). Consultation rates were higher for those in the most deprived quintile compared with the least deprived quintile (all: RR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.16 to 1.19; GP: RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.15 to 1.19; nurse: RR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.11 to 1.15). For all three consultation types, consultation rates increased with age and female sex, and varied by ethnicity. Rates in practices with >8 and ≤19 full-time equivalent (FTE) GPs were higher compared with those with ≤2 FTE GPs (all: RR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.49; GP: RR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.19 to 1.56).

conclusionThe analyses show consistent trends in factors related to consultation rates in general practice across three types of consultation. These data can be used to inform the development of more sophisticated staffing models, and resource allocation formulae.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleGeneral PracticeHealth Services ResearchHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedOffice VisitsPatient Acceptance of Health Careconsultation ratesgeneral practicehealth servicesworkload

Identifiers

PMID29686130
PMCPMC5916084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.