Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29685973›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Epigenetic drug discovery: a success story for cofactor interference.

A Ganesan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Epigenetic Neuropharmacology: Drugs Affecting the Epigenome in the Brain.Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Epigenetics: the first 25 centuries.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

A GanesanSchool of Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK a.ganesan@uea.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4862-7999
University of East Anglia · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within the past two decades, seven epigenetic drugs have received regulatory approval and numerous other candidates are currently in clinical trials. Among the epigenetic targets are the writer and eraser enzymes that are, respectively, responsible for the reversible introduction and removal of structural modifications in the nucleosome. This review discusses the progress achieved in the design and development of inhibitors against the key writer and eraser pairs: DNA methyltransferases and Tet demethylases; lysine/arginine methyltransferases and lysine demethylases; and histone acetyltransferases and histone deacetylases. A common theme for the successful inhibition of these enzymes in a potent and selective manner is the targeting of the cofactors present in the active site, namely zinc and iron cations,

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticEpigenomicsDrug DiscoveryEnzyme InhibitorsHumansEnzyme Inhibitorscofactorsenzyme inhibitorsepigenetics

Identifiers

PMID29685973
PMCPMC5915713
OpenAlexW2802993346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.