Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29685952›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2018

Hypomethylating agents in relapsed and refractory AML: outcomes and their predictors in a large international patient cohort.

Maximilian Stahl, Michelle DeVeaux, Pau Montesinos, Raphael Itzykson, Ellen K Ritchie, Mikkael A Sekeres, John D Barnard, Nikolai A Podoltsev, Andrew M Brunner, Rami S Komrokji and 18 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Phase 1 Study of KITE-222, an Autologous CLL-1-Directed CAR T-cell Therapy in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Chromatin Perturbation Promotes Susceptibility to Hypomethylating Agents.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Maximilian StahlSection of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Michelle DeVeauxDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT.
Pau MontesinosDepartment of Medicine, University of Valencia, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Raphael ItzyksonSection of Hematology, Saint-Louis Hospital, University Paris 7, Paris, France.
Ellen K RitchieWeill Cornell Medicine and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY.
Mikkael A SekeresLeukemia Program, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
John D BarnardLeukemia Program, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Nikolai A PodoltsevSection of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Andrew M BrunnerMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Department of Hematology/Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Rami S KomrokjiDepartment of Malignant Hematology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.
Vijaya R BhattDivision of Oncology & Hematology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE.
Aref Al-KaliDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Thomas CluzeauCote d'Azur University, Nice Sophia Antipolis University, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France.
Valeria SantiniDivision of Hematology, University of Florence, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Amir T FathiMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Department of Hematology/Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Gail J RobozWeill Cornell Medicine and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY.
Pierre FenauxSection of Hematology, Saint-Louis Hospital, University Paris 7, Paris, France.
Mark R LitzowDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Sarah PerreaultDepartment of Pharmacy, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT.
Tae Kon KimSection of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Thomas PrebetSection of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Norbert VeyDepartment of Hematology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Vivek VermaDivision of Oncology & Hematology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE.
Ulrich GermingDepartment of Haematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Juan Miguel BerguaSection of Hematology, Hospital San Pedro Alcántara, Cáceres, Spain; and.
Josefina SerranoSection of Hematology, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Cordoba, Spain.
Steven D GoreSection of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Amer M ZeidanSection of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are frequently used in the frontline treatment of older acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, little is known about their effectiveness in relapsed or primary treatment-refractory (RR)-AML. Using an international multicenter retrospective database, we studied the effectiveness of HMAs in RR-AML and evaluated for predictors of response and overall survival (OS). A total of 655 patients from 12 centers received azacitidine (57%) or decitabine (43%), including 290 refractory (44%) and 365 relapsed (56%) patients. Median age at diagnosis was 65 years. Best response to HMAs was complete remission (CR; 11%) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi; 5.3%). Additionally, 8.5% experienced hematologic improvement. Median OS was 6.7 months (95% confidence interval, 6.1-7.3). As expected, OS differed significantly by best response, with patients achieving CR and CRi having a median OS of 25.3 and 14.6 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the presence of ≤5% circulating blasts and a 10-day schedule of decitabine were associated with improved response rates, whereas the presence of >5% circulating blasts and >20% bone marrow blasts were associated with decreased OS. A significant subset of RR-AML patients (16%) achieved CR/CRi with HMAs and experienced a median OS of 21 months. Outside of a clinical trial, HMAs represent a reasonable therapeutic option for some patients with RR-AML.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualDecitabineDNA MethylationHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMiddle AgedPrognosisRemission InductionRetrospective StudiesSalvage TherapyAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticDecitabine

Identifiers

PMID29685952
PMCPMC5916007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.